Your snide comments and sarcasm did not make your arguement any more valid and suggested to me that even as you were defending your [enter noun here] you are aware that such a way of validating information is fundamentally flawed.

Funny, that's exactly what everyone has been trying to tell YOU...your response was accusing people of judging HOW you say things as oppossed to WHAT you are saying, remember?....and now you want us to sit hear and listen to you lecture someone else about it? not bloody likely mate. FWIWIRS (FWIW in Rocket Science) best wishes.

on topic: JLB, The best defense to being flamed and/or challenged with info you believe to be true is credibility and proof...keep in mind, some people will not even accept proof as a reason to change their views. Still, it's always worth doing your research.