FightingArts
Estore |
Pressure
Points
From a medical professional, straight facts on where and how to hit
that can save your life. |
Stretching
Limber or not, anyone can add height and speed to their kicks
with this method. |
Calligraphy
For yourself or as a gift, calligraphy is special, unique
and lasting. |
Karate
Uniforms
Look your best.
Max snap. low cost & superior crafted: “Peak
Performance Gold” 16 oz uniforms.
|
MOTOBU
Classic book translation. Hard to find. Not in stores. |
|
|
|
0 registered (),
22
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
22740 Members
36 Forums
35473 Topics
431972 Posts
Max Online: 307 @ 02/21/13 09:36 AM
|
|
|
#433261 - 07/13/11 07:59 AM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: Stormdragon]
|
Member
Registered: 02/08/11
Posts: 101
|
The simple reason why MMA ''works better'' is that they have contact. No contact = ridiculous techniques and ''theories''..
The reason why many, or maybe even most TMA are not practical when put under contact is that they don't practice with contact.
And why that happened is a long and complicated tale that nobody will ever agree upon I think it happened when many TMA started to spread out of their breeding grounds i.e Okinawan arts to Japan from Japan to Hawaii&USA.
The times changed and so did the expectations of Martial Arts - what used to be a skill set required for survival and self defense got involved in competitions and sports which from there deterrioated even more.
I think there is a lot to TMA techniques that MMA guys give no credit for but only in TMA where contact is involved.. Ohh yes another reason why MMA fairs much better is also because the contact involved is not ''fixed'' there are people with different backgrounds and different styles training with each other - therefore passing the problems of ''dueling'' and comfort with style vs style fighting.
Anyway there are good TMA schools and bad TMA schools - same goes for MMA it's just easier to screw up with TMA (:
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#433276 - 07/14/11 06:51 PM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: Matakiant]
|
Member
Registered: 04/08/11
Posts: 217
Loc: Missouri
|
I agree with this posting 100% When a TMA person works on his techniques with another TMA person they get used to the old "If I do this...you do that."This is dangerous because on the street A + B doesn't always = C. There has to be some contact to replicate some of the stress and "combat attrition" that would take place on the street. If we get too comfortable working techniques with our fellow classmates one can become mechanical in the way we approach our defense.I have to admit that the MMA guys do work on multiple types fighting at multiple ranges.This is good.I'm not crazy about MMA as a whole,but I must give credit where it's due. I don't think that TMA need a complete overhaul, but many of our training methods need to be looked at in terms of their effectiveness.
Mark
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#433277 - 07/14/11 07:01 PM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: gojuman59]
|
Who Dares Wins
Professional Poster
Registered: 08/05/04
Posts: 3406
Loc: Salem, OR
|
I agree with this posting 100% When a TMA person works on his techniques with another TMA person they get used to the old "If I do this...you do that."This is dangerous because on the street A + B doesn't always = C. There has to be some contact to replicate some of the stress and "combat attrition" that would take place on the street. If we get too comfortable working techniques with our fellow classmates one can become mechanical in the way we approach our defense.I have to admit that the MMA guys do work on multiple types fighting at multiple ranges.This is good.I'm not crazy about MMA as a whole,but I must give credit where it's due. I don't think that TMA need a complete overhaul, but many of our training methods need to be looked at in terms of their effectiveness.
Mark You nailed it, the type of training we employ in MMA is what makes us very versatile and adaptive fighters. That's what it really comes down to, having an answer for every aspect/range of fighting and training live, at least most of the time. Live doesn't have to mean knockdown sparring, nor does it have to mean free sparring, really most of your training with resistance should be at around 50% power and intensity and should isolate certain skills. That's what's helped me the most.
_________________________
Member of DaJoGen MMA school under Dave Hagen and Team Chaos fight team under Denver Mangiyatan and Chris Toquero, ran out of Zanshin Martial Arts in Salem Oregon: http://www.zanshinarts.org/Home.aspx,
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#433278 - 07/14/11 08:14 PM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: Stormdragon]
|
Veteran
Registered: 12/09/07
Posts: 1031
Loc: Olympia, WA
|
The idea of having functional skills that work at different ranges isn't something new. It's new to many modern people because of how arts have been trained for a while. The only exception is submissions on the ground, which aren't found historically very often outside of combat sport. If you look in the past you find almost across the board people were already doing "MMA" before there was such a thing, the arts only recently became separated out like that, and the advent of "stylism" is for mass consumption. "If I do this...you do that." This is true of much of the MMA training i've seen too though, not to the same degree because there is more contact and realism for sure, but MMA definitely seems to have it's own standard "system" of techniques and arts it draws from these days...it's just more well rounded that what you find in most TMA dojos. It seems to still have it's limitations, given how quickly it changes when someone does something "new" in the UFC or another competition. Nonetheless, this idea that MMA has invented something new is totally incorrect, people only believe this because they were raised on TV. In the "old days" prior to martial arts becoming a big commodity things still worked the same (albeit with limitations like no modern safety equipment), you went where teh knowledge was and trained with a variety of folks. If you look at old Karate masters you find the did Judo, or another form of grappling... or if you look further back you find they did Jujutsu. In Chinese arts you were expected to have a well rounded skillset including striking, throwing, locking, simple positional grappling. If you look at older Western martial arts it's the same thing. People did not limit themselves to one dojo, teacher, or style..that is a new thing that has been mislabelled as "traditional" MMA is just going back to how things were before martial arts was sold on the street corner, and what you could do meant more than the name of what you did. Of course there are new developments in training, fitness, and some of the skills are different, but the method is not new at all. In fact the method of learning what you can from whoever is qualified and personally adapting it to yourself is as old as martial arts is, and you can find everyone from the ancient Chinese to Romans writing about it.
Edited by Zach_Zinn (07/14/11 08:25 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#433279 - 07/15/11 04:00 AM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: Zach_Zinn]
|
Who Dares Wins
Professional Poster
Registered: 08/05/04
Posts: 3406
Loc: Salem, OR
|
The idea of having functional skills that work at different ranges isn't something new. It's new to many modern people because of how arts have been trained for a while. The only exception is submissions on the ground, which aren't found historically very often outside of combat sport. If you look in the past you find almost across the board people were already doing "MMA" before there was such a thing, the arts only recently became separated out like that, and the advent of "stylism" is for mass consumption. "If I do this...you do that." This is true of much of the MMA training i've seen too though, not to the same degree because there is more contact and realism for sure, but MMA definitely seems to have it's own standard "system" of techniques and arts it draws from these days...it's just more well rounded that what you find in most TMA dojos. It seems to still have it's limitations, given how quickly it changes when someone does something "new" in the UFC or another competition. Nonetheless, this idea that MMA has invented something new is totally incorrect, people only believe this because they were raised on TV. In the "old days" prior to martial arts becoming a big commodity things still worked the same (albeit with limitations like no modern safety equipment), you went where teh knowledge was and trained with a variety of folks. If you look at old Karate masters you find the did Judo, or another form of grappling... or if you look further back you find they did Jujutsu. In Chinese arts you were expected to have a well rounded skillset including striking, throwing, locking, simple positional grappling. If you look at older Western martial arts it's the same thing. People did not limit themselves to one dojo, teacher, or style..that is a new thing that has been mislabelled as "traditional" MMA is just going back to how things were before martial arts was sold on the street corner, and what you could do meant more than the name of what you did. Of course there are new developments in training, fitness, and some of the skills are different, but the method is not new at all. In fact the method of learning what you can from whoever is qualified and personally adapting it to yourself is as old as martial arts is, and you can find everyone from the ancient Chinese to Romans writing about it. You're pretty much right on with that Zach, although I don't really agree that MMA does that "he does this I do this" training, but as far as martial artists training for all ranges and all aspects of fighting for centuries, I think most everyone who says TMA means how it's been the past 150 years or so, especially in the west. One thing though, is that even very far back there was not really a mindset of "here's several options do what fits your body and feels comfortable for you" like in MMA now, it wasn't very flexible except perhaps boxing in the west in early tiems and maybe pankration (hard to say because no one knows much about pankration). Not to mention no real free sparring before the early 1900's. Of course they probably got in more street fights which I guess can sort of make up for that.
_________________________
Member of DaJoGen MMA school under Dave Hagen and Team Chaos fight team under Denver Mangiyatan and Chris Toquero, ran out of Zanshin Martial Arts in Salem Oregon: http://www.zanshinarts.org/Home.aspx,
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#433280 - 07/15/11 12:19 PM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: Stormdragon]
|
Veteran
Registered: 12/09/07
Posts: 1031
Loc: Olympia, WA
|
One thing though, is that even very far back there was not really a mindset of "here's several options do what fits your body and feels comfortable for you" like in MMA now, it wasn't very flexible except perhaps boxing in the west in early tiems and maybe pankration (hard to say because no one knows much about pankration). Not to mention no real free sparring before the early 1900's. Of course they probably got in more street fights which I guess can sort of make up for that. It's more like 50 years than 150. Do you have any evidence that it wasn't flexible like that? Because I could dredge up countless quotes and accounts that seem to indicate it was like that, people went around to see different people to learn different things, and no one had the exact same skillset. You can read everyone from Musashi to those old Renaissance martial arts guys and it's the same thing: Go where the knowledge is, learn what you can and internalize it. There is nothing new about that philosophy at all. Not to mention no real free sparring before the early 1900's. Of course they probably got in more street fights which I guess can sort of make up for that. That is true to some degree, though I imagine it's also true everywhere else, I wonder how bare-knuckle boxers sparred? There were kinds of free-play and sparring done, as well as contests between different martial artists. In some cases though, peoples training was probably alot more "reality based" than anything you would come by today as they were actually actively getting attacked. In other cases, you could definitely argue there were some limitations in training that don't exist today. My point is that while the skills and some of the training may be new, the idea behind MMA isn't any kind of new thing at all...so this idea that you be a well rounded martial artist isn't something that was just introduced to the world.
Edited by Zach_Zinn (07/15/11 12:21 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#433281 - 07/15/11 02:19 PM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: Zach_Zinn]
|
Who Dares Wins
Professional Poster
Registered: 08/05/04
Posts: 3406
Loc: Salem, OR
|
Not newly introduced, just re-introduced after years of limitation. As for the flexibility of it, it depends on the culture at the time, Japanese culture has always had a very rigid instructor-student relationship where it's "I say, you do" and you just mimicked everything they did to the letter with no real tweaking for what worked better for you personally nor much questioning, at least as far as I hear from people I know who have lineages going back awhile. Chinese and Okinawan martial arts training might have been different. This is probably due to the less individual-focused culture in some places. In the U.S. it's more the rigid approach that took off at first. As for European martial arts, it they were quite a bit different, check out thearma.org, very interesting articles on that.
_________________________
Member of DaJoGen MMA school under Dave Hagen and Team Chaos fight team under Denver Mangiyatan and Chris Toquero, ran out of Zanshin Martial Arts in Salem Oregon: http://www.zanshinarts.org/Home.aspx,
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#433283 - 07/15/11 03:39 PM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: Stormdragon]
|
Veteran
Registered: 12/09/07
Posts: 1031
Loc: Olympia, WA
|
There was effective training long before MMA. There is effective training now with, and without something being called MMA. Because "MMA" isn't anything new, it's just pragmatism in training.The one place I will say it is new is in some of the fitness and physical training, which is always worth looking at.
People have a tendency to look at their own time and say "look, we discovered something new and better"..to a degree they are correct, as things are always changing. In another respect, it's a an attitude that puts on blinders because there is a big assumption there that no one in the past has ever figured out something similar.
This happens in all walks of life, but I think with martial arts is a particularly poor way of looking at things, there have been effective martial arts for a long time, the training methods of today in any art should build on the past while adding innovations, but they shouldn't try to erase, ignore it, or rewrite history.
There is no "end of history" for martial arts, they will continue to change and evolve, the modern MMA phenommenon is certainly a part of that, but it isn't everything, and I don't believe it is the end place of martial arts. This idea that MMA has somehow shown the errors of the past is misleading, as again..it isn't anything new, it's just packaged a bit differently and media is so present everywhere that it's influence is wide. Couple this with the fact that most "traditional" training that average people have experienced is poor, and you get the idea that these things are new of revolutionary.
On the subject of the thread though, while I believe that competition-oriented MMA is certainly effective training in what it aims for, I do not think that MMA gyms have any more place claiming to teach "real world self defense" than anyone else...unless their training is actually geared for that.
I feel the same way when a Judo dojo etc. claims to teach 'street self defense' and is still just teaching Judo.
Training for "street" involves much more than physical skills, and when it does involve physical skills I think they need to be moved to a very different paradigm and mindset than competition. I know there are MMA places that do this, but they do not seem to be the norm.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#433285 - 07/15/11 07:00 PM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: Zach_Zinn]
|
Professional Poster
Registered: 10/23/05
Posts: 2546
|
Training for "street" involves much more than physical skills, and when it does involve physical skills I think they need to be moved to a very different paradigm and mindset than competition. I know there are MMA places that do this, but they do not seem to be the norm.
Fair point, but for the sake of balance it could also be argued that they also need to shift to a different paradigm that most TMA use i.e. the non-resistant "dirty tactics" that IME are commonly drilled in many TMA. Pretending to punch a stationary person in the groin while under zero pressure is different than trying to hit someone outside of class who is aggressive and coming at you, trying to hurt you. I don't think TMA or MMA have all the answers when it comes to that sort of situation. It is worth mentioning though that there have been incidents (both proven and anecdotal) where MMA and TMA have helped a person in a physical confrontation outside of class.
_________________________
"Let your food be your medicine, and your medicine be your food"
Hippocrates.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#433286 - 07/15/11 07:06 PM
Re: street vs sport
[Re: Prizewriter]
|
Veteran
Registered: 12/09/07
Posts: 1031
Loc: Olympia, WA
|
That is a valid point, that is the wrong way to train stuff like that. There are people out there in TMA doing something very different from that. If you aren't testing what you learn something is missing. It is worth mentioning though that there have been incidents (both proven and anecdotal) where MMA and TMA have helped a person in a physical confrontation outside of class. Well said, as always you are a level-headed dude.
Edited by Zach_Zinn (07/15/11 07:14 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Untitled Document
Fight
Videos
Night club fight footage and street fights captured
with the world's first bouncer spy cam
How
to Matrix!
Learn ten times faster with new training method. Learn entire arts
for as little as $10 per disk.
Self Defense
Stun guns, pepper spray, Mace and self defense products. Alarms for personal and home use.
TASER MC26C
Stop An Urban Gorilla: Get 2 FREE TASER M26C Replacement Air Cartridges With Each New TASER M26C!
|
|
|
|
|