CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study.

FightingArts Estore
Pressure Points From a medical professional, straight facts on where and how to hit that can save your life.	Stretching Limber or not, anyone can add height and speed to their kicks with this method.	Calligraphy For yourself or as a gift, calligraphy is special, unique and lasting.	Karate Uniforms Look your best. Max snap. low cost & superior crafted: “Peak Performance Gold” 16 oz uniforms.	MOTOBU Classic book translation. Hard to find. Not in stores.

You are not logged in. [Log In] FightingArts.com Home Page » Forums » Interest Groups » Internal Arts » CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study.

Recent Posts

Children best Age to begin?
by cxt
Yesterday at 07:16 PM

Striking/punching bag technique.
by MAGon
Yesterday at 02:16 PM

Pressure point training in 2013
by aplant
Yesterday at 04:46 AM

If You Could Teach One Person
by iaibear
06/13/13 10:33 PM

The Respect of your Instructor.
by Dobbersky
06/13/13 04:58 AM

Value for Money
by jabber
06/12/13 02:30 PM

Derren Brown One Inch Punch
by aplant
06/12/13 08:53 AM

Karate and ''contact''
by Dobbersky
05/30/13 07:55 AM

Forum Stats

22750 Members
36 Forums
35481 Topics
432058 Posts

Max Online: 307 @ 02/21/13 09:36 AM

Page 4 of 9

Topic Options

#375115 - 01/05/08 07:23 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: jude33]
jude33 Veteran Registered: 03/14/07 Posts: 1539	Judes best guess. It seems the human body does adapt to cold conditions given the right process. Once adapted, then, where as a person not adapted to the cold would normaly shiver the person who has adapted wouldnt. Seems like the more brown cells the more heat is generated by the body when put in to a cold enviroment. There might be more to it than that. In the experiment they say that the more than the usual amount of body heat generation is a by product of that form of meditation? It would seem that extra body heat generation would happen anyway given the right conditions. How much heat generation is another question. Jude .
Top

#375116 - 01/05/08 09:40 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: jude33]
jude33 Veteran Registered: 03/14/07 Posts: 1539	Fileboy. I have decided that from now on I am willing to discuss the topic. I am unwilling to discuss anything else that you dont believe unless it relates to the topic. Magicians, chi, fireballs other things, none native English speakers, what is added to boiling water or anything else you doubt unless it is connected to the topic then please discuss them with some one else who might lend a listening ear. Jude.
Top

#375117 - 01/07/08 06:19 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: jude33]
fileboy2002 Enthusiast Registered: 11/13/05 Posts: 999 Loc: Chicago, IL	I never got off topic. Everything I mentioned was either directly related to the topic or grew out of discussion of the topic.
Top

#375118 - 01/07/08 06:29 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: jude33]
fileboy2002 Enthusiast Registered: 11/13/05 Posts: 999 Loc: Chicago, IL	Here is something directed related to the topic for you: http://www.skepdic.com/chi.html
Top

#375119 - 01/07/08 10:03 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: fileboy2002]
jude33 Veteran Registered: 03/14/07 Posts: 1539	Quote: I never got off topic. Everything I mentioned was either directly related to the topic or grew out of discussion of the topic. I think you might have drifted somewhat from the topic. Then it seems you decided not to answer any of the questions. I suppose they require some "thought" . Quote: Here is something directed related to the topic for you: http://www.skepdic.com/chi.html Nope.I dont think it has anything to do with the topic. . Fileboy, Jude aint interested. Need something to stimulate my brain not something to bore me. Jude Edited by jude33 (01/07/08 10:25 PM)
Top

#375120 - 01/07/08 11:26 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: jude33]
fileboy2002 Enthusiast Registered: 11/13/05 Posts: 999 Loc: Chicago, IL	jude33, if you cannot see how that relates to the topic, I don't know how to help you. I think jude just wants to talk to people who agree with him so he can protect his illusions. Ok, jude33. Beleive what you like: there really IS a Santya Claus.
Top

#375121 - 01/07/08 11:56 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: fileboy2002]
jude33 Veteran Registered: 03/14/07 Posts: 1539	Quote: jude33, if you cannot see how that relates to the topic, I don't know how to help you. I think jude just wants to talk to people who agree with him so he can protect his illusions. Ok, jude33. Beleive what you like: there really IS a Santya Claus. I dont think you could help me anyhow. Posting someone elses work is easy. I think you should read the article about the experiment. Read the article you posted. Then prove to me they are the same topic. And perhaps answer the questions that have been put to you. Otherwise yet again your posting some one elses work Then it could be discussed. So what do you know about people adapting to the cold? What do you know about Brown fat? And where is that in the topic you posted? Jude.
Top

#375122 - 01/08/08 06:15 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: jude33]
fileboy2002 Enthusiast Registered: 11/13/05 Posts: 999 Loc: Chicago, IL	Jude33, When I make assertion you demand evidence; when I provide evidence you criticize me for using someone else's ideas. I know what happens next: I make another assertion. You demand evidence. I provide evidence. You dismiss it as someone else's ideas. I get it now.
Top

#375123 - 01/08/08 06:51 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: fileboy2002]
jude33 Veteran Registered: 03/14/07 Posts: 1539	Quote: Jude33, When I make assertion you demand evidence; when I provide evidence you criticize me for using someone else's ideas. I know what happens next: I make another assertion. You demand evidence. I provide evidence. You dismiss it as someone else's ideas. I get it now. Nope You dont do anything other than post other peoples works. I havent once seen anything you have worked out. As I said instead of dismissing things show me the comparison between the topic and the article you posted. Otherwise all you are doing is increasing the amount of postings you put up. Jude
Top

#375124 - 01/08/08 07:22 PM Re: CHI? Tibetan Monks, Harvard, scientific study. [Re: jude33]
fileboy2002 Enthusiast Registered: 11/13/05 Posts: 999 Loc: Chicago, IL	I have posted over 500 times, and I don't think more than three of my posts have included other people's work. But that is not the point: if I simply "work out" things on my own, you don't accept what I say as legitimate evidence. If I refer to outside sources, you still don't accept it.
Top