So instead of dealing with the reams of objections, counterpoints, and outright self negating contridictions YOU, YOURSELF have posted.
Such as the whole "you need to train in an art prior to offerering ctitisim--still waiting for your training in Uechi or sword BTW.
You instead wish to discuss a static picture.
Ok, fine--not any stonger there.
A-As Ed already pointed out--with MULTIPLE pictures, there are other much better explanations for the finger postion.
I have yet to see ANY photos of Uechi holding a sai.
Ed 100, gang 0--whuch one do YOU think I sould be beliving here.
The guy with NO proofs or the guy with A LOT of proof?
Why do I have to even ask that question.
2-Nope, your still wrong, sure you can argue that fingers are in position to do "X"
But since you already stated you have NO training in Uechi-ryu or kobudo---then there is NO reason to give your ideas any weight.
Plus the hand postions still don't add up--sai are not held like that--ther may be sections/times in which a sai might be in that position---but that is pretty much it.
In effect your argueing that because a sai CAN be held in that positon for a supposed "use" then they MUST HAVE BEEN USED FOR THAT.
Like I said, I CAN use my car to pull tree stumps.
By your post hoc rationalization, that means my car is REALLY a "stump pulling machine."