Quote:

---

Quote:

---

TECHNICAL MAtters refering to technique
is all I am interested in discussing.

---

Then comply with Ed's request (and your offer) of a technical critique of his power generation.
'Ask medulant' does not count as a technical answer.

So far the only technical input you have made on this thread is that the guy should have thrown instead of kept striking (personal opinion),that you felt he should have stomped them unconscious (legally debatable), that he was open too open to groin kicks and overhand rights (show me someone who isnt open to some form of counter when in full offensive and I will show you my hairy a$$).

That level of 'technical discussion' is well within my abilities thanks.

You are a scab that i have just decided to stop picking. our posts are there for all to view, and I trust others on here to draw their own sensible conclusions about you.

And its still video btw.

---

Quote:

---

We want your "blow by blow account" of the video now. You claim to be a kickboxer karate man but yet your bad observation of the video says otherwise. He should have thrown him? they dont teach you takedowns in boxing im afraid. But of course you know that seeing as you are a kickboxer ...face it, the guy was good, he knew what he was doing, and so far all you have done is criticise his actions. Which is fine of course providing that you know what you are talking about, which you so far dont seem to be. Fill in your profile, explain to greater depth what he did wrong, and what he should have done, and then we might take you seriosly. (you still havnt answered my kokutsu dachi question by the way)

---

Quote:

---

not to be rude Leo, but - 17 W4$ 4 90ÐÐ4MN R3ƒ£3X ¥0µ N00BH34Ð!!!!11!!1

oh yeah if this doesnt explain why then nothing will http://www.freewebs.com/moomoomoomoomoomoo/

---

Quote:

---

Scottie you should have been on stage



So any technical points about anything?

---

Sure, Technically, anyone who would seek to have their opinion valued would list their background and reasons they feel qualified for making the statements/assumptions you make about the persons ability and your ability to defeat them.

Technically, to assume that someone will use text book moves in a heated confrontation is unrealistic and shows a lack of experience.


Technically, to boast about one's own ability without basing it on anything relevant such as experience, background, documented fighting record (competitve record -ring, tournament champion, etc.) will lead others to doubt your claims, your ability, and your judgement.

As far as the confrontation on video is concerned, the person defending against the two other men used the skills he was most comfortable with to subdue to agressors. He kept good distancing from them, positioned himself between them and his girlfriend at all times, managed to deal with her screaming and still focus on what needed to be done and her effectively, and showed good control by using only as much force as necessary to accomplish what he set out to do. Also, at no point did he leave himself vulnerable to a two pronged attack. He correctly assessed what each man's level of commitment was to the confrontation and handled them accordingly.

And technically, to think that no one would challenge you for the claims that you made without so much as giving one shred of information to your ability or training is quite naive.

Technically speaking of course.

Scottie

edited to fix quote

Quote:

---

Totally don't get it. Is that some sort of code to describe the guy's technical ability? Or perhaps his intent in hitting the girl?

---

. lol. I said it was a reflex action and that it wasnt intentional, and the website has absolutely no meaning in hell lol