I have heard that if a perp pulls a knife with the blade coming up, between index and thumb, cops are trained to pull their billystick, and if the blade is coming down, out the bottom of the fist, the pinky finger, you are supposed to draw your gun. Can anyone varify or negate this. I'm sure it is different for various agencies and locations.

The trained response to any blade being drawn, regardless of grip, is to:

Draw

Seek hard cover if possibel or practical and...

Challenge and/ or shoot to stop.

I know of no agency that differentiates or prioritizes one grip over another. Although some officers might elect to use a baton based on their own training, experience and confidence, the baton is clearly much lower on the force continuum than what would be considered reasonable in most conceivable circumstances.

A nine year old with a knife that does not advance and only menaces from a distance maybe. Even then, someone should be prepared to use deadly force via firearm, if only as a contingency.

I think Col. Rex Applegate said it best, "I someone pulls a knife on you, he's asking for it. So give it to him, preferably one bullet at a time."

I think you should do some more research here. I have never heard anything like this in my life. I respect you trying to learn and ask questions but this one is out of left field, check your sources.

I would throw my support behind Fletch's words of wisdom. I would just add viewing of "Surviving Edged Weapons" is highy recommended. I have a video tape made in 1988
that was put out by Calibre Press.

It was made for L.E and covers areas like profiles and tactics of offenders who use them, "pre-attack body-language," what does and does not work in the way of defense ect.

I am not sure if they are still selling it or not. You can contact them from the toll free number 800.323.0037 and see if they are still selling the tape?

Take care,
Devin

Interesting reading
The Cutting Edge of Edged Weapons Defense- by George Demetriou (NYC Police Officer) Knife Training: Law Enforcement's Right-Originally published in the Fall 1997 Massachusetts Sentinel

Devin, I concur with you on the video, Surviving Edged Weapons put out by Calibre Press. This is the best I've seen, I'm sure there are other good ones out there.

In a book by Mike Echanis (deceased, rip) dealing with unarmed defense against the knife there is a portion in there that says no matter how small the knife attacker is and know matter how large or well trained the unarmed defender is the knife attacker has the advantage. I concur. The only reason to even try to defend against a knife without a weapon is because of the closeness of the attacker and the surprise of the attack. Otherwise, move away, and engage cover, utilize deadly force or makeshift weapons but don't fight unarmed against the knife. The "billy club" does not trump a knife.

Great points and well taken Intrepidinv1 !

The book you are refering I think is Mike Echanis's "Knife Self-Defense For Combat"published in Burbank, CA: by Ohara Publications in 1977.He does clearly state that the one with the blade has the advantage over the well trained man.

Humbly,
Devin Willis

Agreed.

No one should feel obligated to go empty hand against a blade if their are other options. Sometimes though, it happens too fast, too close and there is no time or room to use other options.

Double agree.

Fletch, in your opinion what are the best options when "it happens to fast, to close and there is not time or room to use other options."

I do recall some of the sweeping type defenses shown in "Surviving Edged Weapons."

Devin,

Obviously you're familiar with this book. I used to do some work out of it but it's been back there in the library for awhile now. How do you feel about some of his unarmed defenses presented in the book?

I recall one wherein you side step as you parry a down type attack and redirect the knife into the attacker. I practiced that one a few time and it felt pretty good. Some of the others are a little more difficult.