FightingArts Estore
Pressure Points
From a medical professional, straight facts on where and how to hit that can save your life.
Stretching
Limber or not, anyone can add height and speed to their kicks with this method.
Calligraphy
For yourself or as a gift, calligraphy is special, unique and lasting.
Karate Uniforms
Look your best. Max snap. low cost & superior crafted: “Peak Performance Gold” 16 oz uniforms.

MOTOBU
Classic book translation. Hard to find. Not in stores.
Who's Online
0 registered (), 59 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Shanktotheright, royal, bobgalle100011, agenonline, TooNice
22862 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
Dobbersky 3
MattJ 2
Marcus Charles 1
TooNice 1
cxt 1
April
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
New Topics
Judo Olympic Games 1964 Tokyo, The Video Gallery
by ergees
04/01/14 05:26 AM
Muay Thai Seminar with Greg Nelson - Marcus Charle
by Marcus Charles
03/24/14 04:39 PM
Fighting On Saturday!!!
by Dobbersky
03/20/14 05:45 AM
Where Are They Now?
by Dobbersky
05/30/13 08:08 AM
AKK kata question
by
09/04/05 01:27 PM
Recent Posts
AKK kata question
by MattJ
04/04/14 05:45 PM
Judo Olympic Games 1964 Tokyo, The Video Gallery
by ergees
04/01/14 05:26 AM
Fighting On Saturday!!!
by Jeff_G
03/30/14 12:44 AM
Muay Thai Seminar with Greg Nelson - Marcus Charle
by Marcus Charles
03/24/14 04:39 PM
Forum Stats
22862 Members
36 Forums
35546 Topics
432375 Posts

Max Online: 424 @ 09/24/13 10:38 PM
Topic Options
#127985 - 10/25/04 06:54 AM why?
Anonymous
Unregistered


Forgive my ignorance but what is the argument about whether aikido is hard or soft? I dont view any form of martial arts as either hard or soft. I would assume that once a practitioner has achieved mastery of certain techniques that they would develope priciples and not focus on techniques. By doing so they would begin to flow and become more effective. I would think that the development and application of priciples as it applies to aikido would be a more fundamental discussion to have.

Top
#127986 - 10/25/04 02:33 PM Re: why?
senseilou Offline
Professional Poster

Registered: 10/14/02
Posts: 2082
Loc: Glendale, Az.
By doing so they would begin to flow and become more effective.

In the sense of Aikido thats true, but not all systems are based on the concept of flowing. Many of the other arts do not stress flow and there in lies the difference. Personally, I don't think the study of principle and concepts is done alot. For the most part, people are technique oriented. They tend to deal in absolutes and stay with in the box. There are other arts that teach root techniques or mother techniques yet the student gets bogged down in the technique and never expands the knowledge of the principles or concepts that are involved.

On the ohter hand many Karate styles are based on strong, powerful linear movements and people never get to the level of seeing the flow in technique. Some styles don't employ it. Others focus on breaking bones, and destroying the attacker. While principle and concepts are involved, very few employ it. I have seen this in my Lua practice. Most Hwaiians use the principle and concepts of the art and the tenents of their culture within the art, and are not technique oriented. However most in the states are technique oriented. They want the techniques now, and do not learn 'about' the techniques.

So here is where the hard and soft comes in. Its the appearance of what they do, but more so, its a mind set and an approach to the art. In Aikido, you have flow, and key extension and basically go with one's joint. Another Jujutsu style is right there, no extension in fact bring them in(take out the space or voiid)and go against the joint, which once again is a harder approach. There are others that are 'break oriented and all locks are breaks, so compared with an Aiki appraoach they are harder.

It a subjective thing, and its a comparison between the arts, which I feel is wrong to begin with. Its funny as Goju Ryu Karate(which means hard/soft)employs soft and hard movements,(in this case hard and soft is defined by the differences like blocking and parying)yet no one ever questions why there is hard and soft movements. Circular and linear as well. It seems that the more linear, the harder you are viewed, and the more circular the softer. Its an appearance and a mis-conception, but that is how its viewed.

I agree the discussion of principle and concept is more important,but its not one alot of people deal in. WIth more and more people training, and more interpretations to what is being done, styles and styles of styles are begininig to define the arts and their approach. People will train in a style then change 2 techniques and call it their own. About 10 years ago I trained with a Aikidoka Sensei who took kotegaeshi with one hand and the other, curled the fingers into the hand. He did ikkyo and added a sweep to the takedown. I asked him why and he said to make his style of Aikido harder. He also employed alot of atemi waza, again to make his Aikido style harder. So this is what you deal with a perception of what makes things hard and soft.

Top
#127987 - 10/27/04 02:04 AM Re: why?
Anonymous
Unregistered


Thank you for your response. My hopes were to play s advocate and hopefully get people to think about principles or throw eggs at me. I agree with the "now" mentality as it applies to techniques. I believe if people took more time in developing the techniques for thier respective art, and not be in such a rush for the next belt/sash they would begin to see how they could apply even the most basic techniques effectively in a variety of situations.

I see your point in the difference of hard and soft being mostly defined through viewers perception and the intent of the practitioner. You and I could both do the same technique and it would be viewed differently. I think that people should practice both aspects as it applies to their art.

In your instruction do you approach the application of principles? If so at what stage of thier development do you broach this concept? Or do you feel this is something that should be developed on their own depending on the level of interest and commitment to the study of martial arts?

Thank you for the conversation and look forward to your reply.

Top
#127988 - 10/27/04 03:20 AM Re: why?
senseilou Offline
Professional Poster

Registered: 10/14/02
Posts: 2082
Loc: Glendale, Az.
Indeed I do teach by principle and concept, but you need a vehicle to teach these. So technique, or combination of basics are used to teach principle. You can teach principle the first night, and not tell the student that its a principle. When you teach them to move, you explain tai Sabaki and the principles of the tai sabaki, howere they will just see the body posturing, but you have given them the principles they understand. I teach principles at the begining, however they are very simple principles ones anyone can understand...like moving from "stance to stance" "push/pull" etc. So yes I do indeed teach principle and concept and we over 100 principles, but many don't learn them till they have trained awhile.

Top


Moderator:  Ames, Cord, MattJ, Reiki 




Action Ads
1.5 Million Plus Page Views
Monthly
Only $89
Details

Ryukyu Art
Artifacts from the Ryukyu Kingdom missing since WWII. Visit www.ShisaLion.Org to view pictures

Best Stun Guns
Self Defense Products-stun guns, pepper spray, tasers and more

Surveillance 4U
Complete surveillance systems for covert operations or secure installation security

Asylum Images
Book presents photo tour of the Trans-Allegany Lunatic Asylum. A must if you're going to take a ghost tour!

 



Unbreakable Unbrella

krav maga