Posted by: Alex89
Your opinions - 03/23/05 11:59 AM
Hey, so I have an oral presentation for english class. I chose the the subject of martial arts and self defense. This is what I am planning to say: In todays world there is a lot of controversy between the martial atrs and self-defense. A lot of people think that the martial arts is useless as a form of self-defense. This is how the martial arts was started: Martial arts started 2000 years ago in India. There was an Indian prince who traveled to the shaolin temple in China, and thaught this martial arts to the defenseless monks. After a while a lot of country's modified this martial art to suit their own needs of defenses.
That means that the martial arts were indeed invented for self-defense. Martial arts=Art of war. There are a lot of people who also think that the martial arts is just a punch and a kick and that anyone could do a punch or a kick. But it is scientifically proven that if you want to perfect a kick or punch you have to do 500 repetitions of that punch or kick. Lets say that you were a regular person with no martial arts training, you would porbably be able to land the kick good on the person the first time, but the second time you might not, because of your lack of training.
Although there are forms of martial arts that you maybe woudn't use in a real self-defense situation, for example Iaido, that martial art uses a sword.
A lot of people also critisize tae kwon do as being a sport. That depends in what organization you sign up in, and it also depends if you attend a McDojang.
Finally I would like to say that the martial arts are not useless for self-defense. If they were useless they wouldn't of have been invented in the first place. It also depends on how much you train in your type of martial art. Because as they say,"There is no Gain without Pain".
I will probably have to touch it up a bit more. What do you guys think of it?
That means that the martial arts were indeed invented for self-defense. Martial arts=Art of war. There are a lot of people who also think that the martial arts is just a punch and a kick and that anyone could do a punch or a kick. But it is scientifically proven that if you want to perfect a kick or punch you have to do 500 repetitions of that punch or kick. Lets say that you were a regular person with no martial arts training, you would porbably be able to land the kick good on the person the first time, but the second time you might not, because of your lack of training.
Although there are forms of martial arts that you maybe woudn't use in a real self-defense situation, for example Iaido, that martial art uses a sword.
A lot of people also critisize tae kwon do as being a sport. That depends in what organization you sign up in, and it also depends if you attend a McDojang.
Finally I would like to say that the martial arts are not useless for self-defense. If they were useless they wouldn't of have been invented in the first place. It also depends on how much you train in your type of martial art. Because as they say,"There is no Gain without Pain".
I will probably have to touch it up a bit more. What do you guys think of it?