Martial Arts History of China and India

Posted by: kennethtennyson

Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/12/05 04:01 PM

Martial Arts in China and India
Through my readings of martial arts history, I discovered a disturbing trend. Many nationalistic Indians are trying to lay claim that they discovered martial arts and kung fu, karate, and all of the East Asian Martial arts originated from them along with the transmittal of Buddhism. Unfortunately, India today in terms of written historical text, is in a state of flux. For the last few decades, the Hindu nationalistic parties have been distorting historical texts and in general the history of India. Accurate historical texts are dismissed, children are taught fabrications, and sometimes outright lies that are pro-Indian and pro-Hindu. Many of these distortions have engendered their way into the internet age on websites and have been self propagating especially with Indian writers. The result of this is that much of the history of India in present time, has been distorted in some way as to make it difficult to separate fact from fiction. The purpose of this article is to dispel the myths that are currently being propagated by Nationalistic Indians. In this article, Kung Fu will relate to Chinese martial arts, and Shaolin Kung Fu relates to the Kung Fu style originating in the Shaolin temples.

To begin with, very few historians believe that martial arts originated from one place and spread throughout the world. Most military powers in their history have invented some form of martial arts, such as wrestling and self-defense in ancient Sparta and Greece. Most historians believe that many of the martial arts even in Japan (lost in legend with oldest accounts possibly 27B.C.), Korea (Silla Kingdom 57 B.C.), Southeast Asia, and South Asia developed independently to some degree and perhaps influenced each other after their invention. Most of these martial arts share similarities possibly through influences on each other, but most likely secondary to the fact that armed or unarmed combat by human beings employs similar principles and the human body is similar. The reason why the East Asian Martial Arts are so popular today is due to the fact that they have been so well codified, their ease of use and effectiveness in self-defense, their use of the entire human body and scientific principles for self-defense, their focus on personal development, and especially the popular media.

The Indian belief that India is the origin of Kung Fu (Chinese Martial arts) and most Eastern martial artists center on their contention that Bodhidharma (Pu Tai Ta Mo in Chinese or Daruma Daishi in Japanese) the creator of Zen Buddhism came from India, notably south India, and spread Zen Buddhism along with martial arts from India to China sometime in 450 AD. To begin with, history does not know the origins of Bodhidharma, as most of the biography relating to him has been lost in legend. Bodhidharma has also been associated with the discovery of tea (unlikely as the Chinese have historical records and even an ancient encyclopedia stating that they have been drinking tea since 200 B.C. or so) and that he could bore a hole into a wall by looking at it. Further, no historical efforts have accurately shown where he originated from, and many accounts differ. Some suggest India, others suggest Central Asia and perhaps Tibet.

Secondly, historical records suggest that Bodhidharma might have taught the Shaolin monks meditation exercises in 500A.D.; however, historical evidence has shown that the Shaolin monks during this time and before this time (the Shaolin temple predates Bodhidharma) harbored retired soldiers, who taught the monks self defense that they had learned during military training. Not only that, various meditation exercises such as those of Taoism, existed before this time that predates Bodhidharma by a millenia. The Shaolin monks, in order to protect themselves from bandits and criminals around 500A.D, began to codify what they learned into a "Shaolin" Kung-Fu style; however, the development of Kung Fu (or general martial arts in China) goes back millenia before this.

The oldest evidence of Kung Fu, or Chinese martial arts, as it is practiced by the military goes back to the Zhou dynasty (1111-255 BC). The first written history of Chinese martial arts comes from the reign of Huangdi, the Yellow Emperor of the Zhou Dynasty (1122-255 BC). Huangdi was a famous military general, before becoming China’s leader and wrote a lengthy treatise about martial arts. He is also credited with being the founder of China’s oldest known martial art – chang quan (long fist). Further, the Taoist monks were practicing physical exercises that resembles Tai Chi (or a soft form of Kung fu) at least during the 500B.C. era. In 39-92 A.D. , the "Six Chapters of Hand Fighting", in the Han Book of Arms were written by Pan Kuo. Also, the Hua To, "Five Animals Play" - tiger, deer, monkey, bear, and bird, was developed during 220 A.D. As stated earlier, the Kung Fu that is practiced today developed over the centuries and many of the later additions of Kung Fu, such as the Shaolin Kung Fu style, later animal forms and the drunken style were incorporated from various martial arts forms existing later on in China or have accurate historical data relating to their inventor.

Third, unfortunately, there is very little historical evidence to lay claim to the Indian contention that their various martial arts predates East Asian martial arts. Mythology does exist in India as to their creation of martial arts going back a few thousand years, but mythology exists in every culture relating to the origins of martial arts going back a few thousand years. Mythology does not equate historical evidence. In fact, the various Indian martial arts, especially Kalaripayate, had very few practitioners before the advent of the modern age and especially the "Bruce Lee" era. Contemporary Indians in India were just as fascinated with Kung Fu as regular Americans in America were. Very little historical evidence suggests that Indians were practicing their martial arts as it is in its current form even a few centuries ago. What historical evidence exists suggests that the East Asian martial arts predates the current Indian martial arts. Whatever similarities exist are either due to the innate requirements that the human body requires in order to defend itself, or were additions to the Indian martial arts, possibly through Mongol or Muslim conquest later on or within the last century with international trade.

Another interesting concept is the idea of "chi" or life force energy. Many Indians believe that they invented this concept with their ideas of "prana." However, historical evidence suggests that various cultures have a similar concept, even within SouthEast Asia and South America. Historically, "Chi" developed from Taoism and Lao Tse Tung from concepts that predate 500B.C., and this invention predates that of Buddhism's introduction introduction to China. Further, Tai Chi, which is the martial arts exercise developed with Taoism also predates Buddhisms introduction to China, and historical books related to its breathing exercises go back to at least 500 B.C. Finally, Indian contention that Karate and Kalarippayat share common ancestry due to their similar sound is doubtful as both words are anglicized constructions of multiple Japanese and Indian words, both of which have totally opposite meaning. Kara-Te in Japanese means "Empty Hand." In India, "Kalari" is an arena for combat; "payat" stands for a system of combat.

The historical inaccuracies that are being propagated by nationalistic Indians on the web and in print are concerning. Even today, some Indian children are being taught that the East India Trading Company was created in India, when in fact, it was a British company that took over India. As to the influences of the various martial arts of India and China on each other, no one knows as no evidence exists. However, it is a long stretch of the imagination to believe that all of the East Asian Martial Arts or even Chinese martial arts had their origins in India as historical evidence suggests that the Chinese martial arts predates the Indian martial arts. The historical inaccuracies are dangerous for the Indians, as the Indian martial arts should be a source of cultural pride for Indians. However, by stretching the truth, at times fabricating the truth, and making fallacies of reasoning, nationalistic Indians today are lending doubt to the whole history of Indian martial arts.

-Kenneth Tennyson, Ph.D
Posted by: ButterflyPalm

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/13/05 02:19 AM



So what's new?

Did Abraham Lincoln really cut down a cherry tree? and dutifully confessed?

Did Japanese soldiers looted and raped their way through Nanjing, South China? According to a recently re-written Japanese history textbook for grade school, NO.

I suppose the Indians will next claim that silk was discovered by a 2000BC Indian princess who happened to be singing and dancing round a mulberry tree one day (as they still do now in Indian movies?) and why not, given that the majority of Indian women in India to-day still wear silk sarees as an everyday wear.

I suppose Henry Ford was right -- history is bunk! or something to that effect.

Since humans or pre-humans needed to fight right from the stone-age period and the present state of archaeological knowledge suggests that the earliest humans were found in Africa, then we can say, guite confidently, that kung fu or MA in general must have been practiced first in darkest Africa and then maybe spread to India or that perhaps the early dark-skinned Africans tracked their way to the Indian subcontinent (bringing their primitive MA with them) and eventually evolved into the present day dark-skinned south Indians.

This should make a good topic for a PhD. dissertation.
Posted by: MAGr

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/13/05 08:58 AM

It would be great to have an unbiassed, historically accurate source that gave us the true story about the origins of oriental martial arts.

The fact that each nation (with no exceptions) construes history to suit their puurpose, that all historical texts, portray the foreigners as the bad people and the domestic as the good. What you are saying is not something new.
Merit is given to the country with the loudest voice, and thats just the way it is.

Personally i find more constructive to try and find out the truth rather than critisize the lies.

Borders, and nationalities when claiming rights over an "invention" is stupid.
Ok so the Greeks invented democracy, does that give merit to the Greek state corruption nowadays?
NO, it gives credit to the individual minds of Socrates and Plato etc...
Does the fact that India or China invented MAs give credit to the country? NO, it gives credit to the individual who first started it, who cares if it came from China, does that make modern Chinese people more enlightened?
History should be acredited to the individual not the country that bore him/her.
Of course its all part of cultural heritage, but if the Chinese and in turn the Indians believe that it is part of their heritage then it is, not because you prove or disprove it but because they have assimilated it into their culture.
Christianity did not start everywhere at once, yet christians of all nationalities lay claim to the religion.

I dont know if what I am saying makes sense, or even if I m right, but I truly believe that history is what people make of it and what people want to do with it, rather than a series of "facts".
Posted by: Bushi_no_ki

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/13/05 12:47 PM

History is written by the victors. Or in this case, is written by governments to try and make their nation seem even greater. Let me put it this way, I wouldn't even want to try and find out how many times "Just build your damn casinos and shut up" has been said in all the back room politics in the US in the last decade. I'm sure that India had its indigenous MA, and that some influence may have spread with the rise of Buddhism to other nations. I'm also sure that much of the foundation of JMA is indigenous to Japan. There will always be myths and legends and outright lies surrounding the history of many nations, including which ones originated this style of MA or that. Take American Kenpo Karate for example. The moves used all originate from China/Japan/Okinawa. But the nomenclature is all American, and the attitude/philosophy has a definite American bent to it. There is no single nation of origin for this art, simply because it came to be out of the necessity of a culture that needed it's own MA, and needed it to be effective.
Posted by: DrAgOnPuNcH

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/20/05 10:04 AM

Interesting...I'm indian American (my parents are coincidentaly from the exact state that kallaripayet is practiced)and i heard this story being thrown around alot...

about the indian buddhist monk bringing martail arts to china...

If you look at kallaripayet some of it looks similar to kung fu styles due to the forms are all animal forms. They do have similarities...and the indian belief in internal power (yoga) also mirrors chinese philosphy as well...

but i think its naive to say without a shadow of a doubt that they were influenced by each other...i mean there is no tangible real hard evidence to substantiate it...

it's pretty much a legend, the way i look at it is it could be true or just a bunch of sensationalist bs (think about it a wandering monk brought a fighting style...sounds cool and mysterious)
Posted by: tao_majick

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/20/05 10:33 AM

All this nationalistic ferver from the Indians...thats bad juu juu. Any racial/national ferver stems from pride....pride is evil.
Posted by: laf7773

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/20/05 01:44 PM

Quote:


Did Abraham Lincoln really cut down a cherry tree? and dutifully confessed?





Not to split hairs or anything but it was Washington who chopped down the cherry tree. I'm going back into my hole now.
Posted by: DrAgOnPuNcH

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/20/05 10:53 PM

Quote:

Quote:


Did Abraham Lincoln really cut down a cherry tree? and dutifully confessed?





Not to split hairs or anything but it was Washington who chopped down the cherry tree. I'm going back into my hole now.




lol...i was gonna leave that alone...but ya it was GW
Posted by: ButterflyPalm

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/21/05 04:37 AM



So did Washington really chopped down the cherry tree?

*looking for another hole*
Posted by: Bushi_no_ki

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/21/05 08:23 PM

BP, I'm sure Washington chopped more than a few cherry trees down in his life, the question is, did he chop one down and then tell his father when asked about it.
Posted by: eyrie

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/21/05 09:58 PM

Back on topic.... Indian martial arts have the Greeks (well, actually Macedonians) to thank for.
Posted by: Kosh

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/22/05 08:05 AM

Why?
Posted by: MAGr

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/22/05 09:01 AM

A long time ago there was Athens, Sparta and Macedonia, amongst other smaller municipalities, under the leadership of Alexander the Great they joined to form Greece. All of which had kick a$$ armies and military training regimes (especially Sparta) and then they all invaded Asia, reaching almost all the way to China. They mixed highly with those cultures and traded knowledge. Greeks gained knowledge is astronomy and navigation and seamanship among other things, and Arabs learnt about fighting, philosophy, democratic and autocratic systems, trading etc.

They reached India and hence eyrie says that there must have been some influence in fighting techniques. I dont know but I would think that some of it rubbed off, considering the Greek army were so successful.
Posted by: Bushi_no_ki

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/22/05 07:39 PM

mag, that's pretty close. Alexander did get quite a way into India before he was wounded and had to turn back. And the Athenians had democratic rule before Alexander was born. I'm sure there were some influences both ways there, especially since the Macedonians spent so much time in Persia.
Posted by: MAGr

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/22/05 08:00 PM

Bushi,
Alexander died at the age of 32 from pneumonia, he wasnt wounded.
Athenians had it before the time of Alexander thats correct (its a shame they ve lost it now, with corruption and what not).
Did you know that they had this law called ostrascism that stated that if anyone one man got to rich in relation to the rest, he was banished from Athens until his wealth diminished? Also the richest people had a rota system of who contributes the most taxes for building ships every year.

But the most impressive thing about the ancient Greeks, was self critisism. They had the frame of mind to critisize their own rule, their own shortcomings. Women had no place in society (as has been everywhere until recently) but the head playwright wrote a play satirizing the male brutishness and making the women seem the more logical and the final victors of an encounter. This play was not only written by men, but funded by men and watched by men. The state would also fund plays that would ridicule the very people who funded it. There are other countless example of this.

And I m sorry for going into a rant, but it just a shame that instead of progressing from there we have actually taken leaps backwards.
Posted by: eyrie

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/22/05 10:23 PM

There is much conjecture on how he died. I think pneumonia may have been symptomatic rather than causal.

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol9no12/03-0288.htm
Posted by: Bushi_no_ki

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 06/23/05 09:02 PM

As I understand it, per a History Channel special that was on quite recently, Alexander did make it into India. There would have been communication between India and Persia in those days, so anything the Greeks took to Persia would have had influence across the mountains.
Posted by: jingolingo

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 07/15/06 05:50 AM

There is no connection whatsoever between Kalaripayattu and Kung-Fu. Kalaripayatttu was formed around the 13th century and Daruma Bodhidarma was alive around the 6th century who traveled to China. There is a 700 year gap between him and the formation of Kalaripayattu. Also, Daruma Bodhidarma was born in the ancient Pallava kingdom of Kanchipuram which is situated in the state of present day Tamil Nadu where Kalaripayattu is not a native art of the state. As a matter of fact Tamil Nadu itself has several martial arts which predate Kalaripayattu thousands of years and are even mentioned in the Tamil literature such as the Silappadikaram during the Sangam Age of the 1st century A.D. Another piece of Tamil literature which mentions of these martial arts is called the Purunaruru or which is basically Four Hundreds songs on War and Wisdom written around 500 B.C.E.

Another thing I would like to point out is that India was not in existence before the arrival of the British around the 1600s. It was the British who unified the states and other regions into India along with Burma and Pakistan. Before the British, the Indian sub-continent consisted of many countries and kingdoms. The latest parts of the sub-continent to be brought into the Indian Union were the 5 French territories of Pondicherry in 1956. Before that, it was Assam, Manipur, and the other Eastern states which came under the British rule and became part of their India during the late 1800s which can be found at Thang Ta: Martial Art of Manipur. At one time the states of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and even parts of Sri Lanka were originally called Tamil Akkam. It was one Tamil administration with three major dynasties being the Pandyan, Cholas, and the Cheras. The Pallavas were also part of Tamil Akkam at one time. However, their empire was divided by Tamil Nadu and Andra Pradesh. The land where the Cheras ruled later came to be known as Kerala where they formed their own language out of Tamil called Malayalam. As a Matter of fact, Tamil Akkam had such a powerful army and navy in Southern India and Sri Lanka, that not even the Mauryan Empire of Asoka could over power it. It is amazing how Emperor Asoka was able to conquer from North India to Pakistan, Afghanistan and much of central India, but could not conquer Tamil Akkam! This was probably due to their martial expertise as well. Much information can be found along with a map of the Mauryan Empire of Asoka in K.A. Nilakanta Sastri's Age of the Nandas and Mauryas. Another good book to read on this would be Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas by Romlia Thapar. Here is a link to the map of the extent of Asoka's Empire

Going back to Kalaripayattu, it resembles a lot like Ninjitsu. This art may have been modified over the years to its present state. As for the Martial Arts of Tamil Nadu and Northern Sri Lanka, they are called Kuttu Varisai (empty hand combat), Varma Kalai (pressure point study), and an array of weapons arts. Kuttu Varisai resembles a mix of both Karate and Kung Fu having its own animal forms too. There is one stance in Kuttu Varisai which resembles the horse stance which is found in Kung Fu and Karate. However, it is called the Bear stance.

There are many weapons arts and each weapon is a mastery of its own. One of the most famous one is called Silambam which is similar to the Bo staff fighting in Japan. There are a total of 96 Katas for this art. Another weapon is the Erathai or the double stick similar to the Filipino Kali or Sinawali. There are two unique weapons which are not found outside of Southern India which is the Surul Pattai (steel blade whip) and the Madhu (deer horns). Other weapons arts of the Tamil country are the Val Vitchi (single sword) and the Eretthai Val (double short sword).

Between the 2nd to 12th century AD the Pallavas and the Cholas have done intensive sea trade with Southeast Asian kingdoms like that of Angkor (Cambodia), Sri Vijaya (Indonesia) and even as far as China. It is possible that the Pallavas may have had contact with Japan during their seafaring naval expeditions. A good source on that would be in the book titled Traditional Cultural Link between India and Japan (During the 8th and 9th centuries) written by Dr. Kalpakam Sankarnaryan and Dr. Motohiro Yoritomi. There is a possibility the inhabitants of the islands of Japan may have adopted certain forms of Kuttu Varisai and Silambam by the Pallavas. Silambam which might be precursors to Kendo, Ken-Jutso, and Karate.

During the Chola Empires zenith between the 10th and 12th centuries they had conquered much of Southern India and Eastern parts going through Manipur, Assam, and Southern Burma. There empire stretched to as far south as Sri Lanka & Maldives, and to the East was Sumatra, Java, and Malaysia (Kadaram). Their martial arts must have been one of their exports along with various other arts like dance, architecture, and the Tamil version of the Ramayana. The Ramayana (or Ramayanan, Ramavataram) was re-written from Sanskrit to Tamil by the sage Kavicakravarti Kamban of the 9th century A.D. of the Chola kingdom of Tanjore, Tamil Nadu. There are certain moves which are in Muay Thai which are called the Hanuman or Lim Lom. Hanuman was a warrior in the Ramayana epic. Three sources on this can be found in Cholas by K.A. Nilakanta Sastri, Mystery of the Maldives by Thor Heyerdahl, and Muay Thai: The Most Distinguished Art of Fighting written by Panya Kraithat and Pitisuk Kraitus.

As for the Shaolin, it may be possible that Daruma Bodhidarma did go there and introduced Dhyan [Zen (in Japanese), Chan (in Chinese)]. The absence of fighting forms in China before Daruma Bodhidarma is absolutely false. If there was no fighting form in China, then how did there armies fight which most definitely predates the arrival of Daruma Bodhidarma? There were fighting forms in China. It was Daruma Bodhidarma who introduced his concept of breathing exercises, the arts of the vital points and the 18 Lohan which can be seen in Kuttu Varisai of present day Tamil Nadu. His introduction of these Dravidian combat forms and exercises was adopted by the Chinese which later evolved into Kung - Fu. However, Bodhidarma was also not the only Sage who went to China.

There was another Tamil sage who travelled to China well before him around the 5th century B.C. by the name of Boghar Siddha. He was accompanied by Lao Tse the founder of Taosim and who was the first Chinese to propound the theory of duality of matter -- the male Yang and female Yin -- which conforms to the Siddha concept of Shiva - Shakti or positive-negative forces. In Tamil, Yin and Yang translates to Idai Nadi (female, moon) and Pingelai Nadi (male, sun). The unification of the two becomes Lingam which is a symbol of Siva. The Sanskrit adaptation of the Yin and Yang is Shiv and Shakt (or Siva and Shakti). The Sanskrit translation of the unification of Shiv and Shakt is called Prana. Prana is "breath" and is understood as the vital, life-sustaining force of living beings and the vital energy in all natural processes of the universe.

Acupuncture from Tamil Akkam was also introduced to parts of Asia. This was called Varma Cuttiram also known as Varma Kalai. Originally formed as a medicinal healing art, this can also be used to maim and even kill people. Arts in China which relate to the Varma arts are Tai Chi and Dim Mak.

In Southeast Asia the arts of Krabi Krabong in Thailand and Silat in Indonesia bear a lot of resemblances of the Dravidian warfare arts of Southern India. The animalistic styles and even forms of animism found in Silat are also found in Kuttu Varisai where invokes a specific animal spirit or energy into ones body. Many Chola and Pallava Naval and Merchant ships landing in parts of Southeast Asia have not only brought with them the Hindu and Buddhist religions, but the martial arts as well which fused with the indigenous fighting styles of Southeast Asia. Source Tamil Merchant Guild in Sumatra written by K.A. Nilakanta Sastri.

In the Bible in the book of Solomon and Esther it mentions about trade and contact with India. The term India was used in the King James Version which was translated from Hebrew and Greek during the 1600s and the rise of the British Empire. The King James came about after the British took control over many kingdoms and countries forming it into one British Administration and giving the name India. India is actually a Latin word for Indo or Indus in Greek which is Hindu in the Persian language of Farsi near Iran and Pakistan. In the Tamil texts it mentions about King Solomon’s trade and contact with the Chera, Pandya, and Chola kingdoms of Tamil Akkam. King Solomon was not the only one in contact with the Dravidian kingdoms but Rome, Greece, and Egypt. This information can be found in Foreign Notices of South India: from Megasthenes to Ma Huan written by K.A. Nilakanta Sastri. Other than spices, precious stones, silk, and exotic animals being exported to Rome, Greece and the Middle East, weapons and fighting styles were exported as well. The Romans and the Greeks who traveled to Tamil Akkam were known by the ancient Tamils as the Yavanas. Weapons like the trident amongst others were imported to Rome including certain fighting forms which were used in gladiatorial fights in Rome. More information can be found in Silambam fencing from India by Manuel J. Raj and The Commerce Between the Roman Empire and India by E.H. Warmington.

There are even older fighting styles found on the African continent which may have found its way to the Indian sub-continent and from Australia. These are known as Dambe of Nigeria which one hand is bound for punching, and kicking and head butting are allowed. Similar arts to Dambe are Adi Thada of the Tamils, and Muay Thai of Thailand. The Ringa wrestling of Madagascar is similar to the Tamil wrestling called Malyutham. Amongst the many fighting styles and sports of Africa is the Savika bull fight which can also seen in the Tamil Nadu and parts of Northeastern Sri Lanka bull fights known as Jalli Kattu. Ancient Tamil texts mention of an ancient land mass connecting India with Australia and Madagascar. It also mentions names of cities and rivers which lie beneath the Indian Ocean today. The Indian sub-continent and Australia both lay on the same tectonic plate called the Indo-Australian plate. The tsunami of December 2004 also proved the Lemurian theory when it washed back a couple of miles exposing temples and artifacts in the Bay of Bengal near Mammalapuram, Tamil Nadu. That was the fourth tsunami recorded in the history of South Asia. The third was during the early 1900s. In the Tamil Silappadikaram it also mentions of a great flood or tsunami which wiped out an ancient Pandyan city. An interesting book which goes into detail is called The Lost Land of Lemuria: Fabulous Geographies by Sumathi Ramaswamy The resemblances between Tamils, Malayalees, Australian aborigines and East African are very close. There is an ancient weapon that was used in Tamil Akkam called the Valari which resembles the Boomerang of Australia. The Velari was shaped like the boomerang, but was tipped with a metal blade. Here is an article written by Dr. S.JAYABARATHI JAYBEE on the Valari Weapon

In conclusion, martial arts of India today were actually the martial art of Tamil Akkam thousands of years back and not ancient India. India or the Indian Union did not come into play until after the arrival of the British around the 1600s. Kalari Payat is a very dynamic martial art with an array of weaponry including pressure point attacks and massage. However, it does not go any further back than the 13th century as quoted from Phillip Zarilli's When the Body Becomes All Eyes: Paradigms, Discourses and Practices of Power in Kalarippayattu, a South Indian Martial Art . Daruma Bodhidarma was also well alive almost 700 hundred years before the formation of Kalaripayattu. There were many other sages and monks who have travelled from present day Southern India to China well before Daruma Bodhidarma. Till this day, the sub-continent of India remains a mystery to many people around the world. There are many reasons. One reason is because many people have a habit of modifying history, changing culture, uplifting certain cultures, neglecting other cultures, and try to invent a new culture and call it ancient. Also many vast exaggerations on India which most people claim to be facts are speaking of nothing more than a fools paradise of a modified "mix and match" culture...
Posted by: trevek

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 07/17/06 04:09 AM

Alex was wounded several times in his campaigns. One of the notable events being when he jumped over the wall of a city on his own and his body guards had to rescue him (something I couldn't believe that film missed out!).

However, to what extent it contributed to his death is open to debate.

I am more concerned with the apparent idea that nobody knew how to fight until the Greeks arrived. We seem to be overlooking the fact that there were vast armies in this part of the world who had pretty successful track records until Alex arrived (Persians et al).

With regards to the self-criticism, it is also interesting that the playwrights also wrote plays using the subjects of ancient legends and used them to criticise contemporary events and politics, including over zealous military campaigns etc.
Posted by: IExcalibui2

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 07/17/06 12:43 PM

I doubt that Alexander was the one that impacted Indian MA, which in turn impacted Chinese MA since the history of China reaches farther back than that of Alexander. There was a China before it officially became China under Qin shi Huang Di (the 1st emperor of China). There are records of previous ruling dynasties and of course there were the 7 kingdoms. China already had MA back then. I think of it as what Wu Shu really was before it was changed. I dont think that Chinese MA all sprouted from the Shaolin Temple because much has happened in China before Buddhism was even introduced to the country.
Posted by: jingolingo

Re: Martial Arts History of China and India - 07/17/06 07:22 PM

I would dare say that Alexander had a strong influence on the grappling art of Vajramushti of Gujurat, Northwestern India. It resembles quite a bit like the Greek Pankration. Also in Northern India close to Afghanistan are many stone sculptures of the Buddha and others which basically have Greek features . However, there was no India at the time back then just like how Iran and Iraq didn't exist during the time of Alexander, when it actually was Persia. The kingdoms he fought there were the Ghandaras, Aspasios, Assekenois, and the Kambojas of Northern present day India.

While the Northern part of the sub-continent was subject to numerous invasions from the Indo-Aryas, Greeks, Mongolians, and the Islamic Moghuls; the southern part had the three oceans for protection including a powerful Navy. There was a lot of sea commerce and trade between Tamil Akkam (present day Southern India/ Sri Lanka) and the West (Greece, Rome, Egypt) including the East like China. Just like Daruma Bodhdarma wasn't the only person from the sub-continent to travel to present day China, Alexander wasn't the only Greek or foreign traveller to the Indian sub-continent.

One of the earliest travellers to the Indian sub-continent by sea was the philosopher, Herodotus (5th century B.C.). It was he and other Greek writers who clssified the Dravidians (Greek word for Thamilians - Tamils) as Eastern Ethiopians. Another, Greek traveller Megasthenes visited one of the Pandyan kingdom of Tamil Akkam around 350 B.C. to 290 B.C. Roman philospher Gaius Plinius Secundus travelled to Tamil Akam around the 1st century A.D. He discovered that Sri Lanka and Southern India was divided by a river, and later learned that it was an island! Other travellers were the merchant fleet of King Solomon (1000 B.C.), Emissaries of Augustus Caesar (1st century A.D.), Marcian of Heraclea (400 A.D.), and Marco Polo (between the 12th and 13th centuries). It was at the turn of the 15th century when Portuese traveller Vasco De Gamma sailed to the Indian sub-continent and colonized the Southern Part from Bombay (Bom Bahia in Portuguese meaning Nice Bay) all the way to Sri Lanka (Cey Lao in Portuguese). The names Cey Lao and Bom Bahia later were changed to Ceylon and Bombay during the British rule. Some good sources to read more on this would be Foreign Notices of South India: From Megasthenes to Mahuan by K.A. Nilakanta Sastri and The Commerce Between the Roman Empire and India by E.H. Warmington

Going back on whether the Greeks had an influence on the fighting techniques in India, I can say yes and no. Yes for the fact that Vajramushti grappling resembles a lot like Pankration, and no it did not influence the martial arts in present day Southern India and Sri Lanka. The fighting styles of Tamil Akkam were absent in Central and Northwestern India. If one were to see the route how Daruma Bodhdarma and others travelled to China it would make sense. It seems as though the places touched during these travels from Tamil Nadu was Orrisa, Manipur, Assam, Nepal, Tibet and then to Shaolin. All these places have similar and very close styles to those found in the southern Dravidian states of present day Kerala and Tamil Nadu. Therefore, the route must have went along the Eastern coast of the Indian sub-continent heading north.


It is interesting how a group, empire, or nation during history would move eastwards where ever it may be spreading their cultural influence. For example:

  • Greeks spreading influence to east to Persia and present day Northern India
  • Eastern Africans spreading influence to present day South India and Sri Lanka
  • Dravidian or Tamil kingdoms of South India spreading influence east to Southeast Asia
  • Chinese Dynasties spreading influence east to Korea and Japan
  • Indigenous Indonesians spreading influence east to South Pacific
  • Polynesians spreading influece east to Meso-America or pre-Colombian America, basically South America.

    More information on this can be found in Thor Heyerdahl's American Indians in the Pacific and Mystery of the Maldives.