'Real goju'?

Posted by: harlan

'Real goju'? - 01/20/06 08:28 AM

Newbie question: is there a 'standard' way of performing Goju kata, and where can one 'see' it? I've been looking at Goju kata online for a bit now, and each website seems a little different from each other, as well as different from what I learn. Is there a standard way of performing kata (and who does it) that is taught, or variations/personal interpretations of kata that can be considered 'acceptable'? (If yes...what are the criteria for acceptance?)

Thank you for feedback to the newbie.
Posted by: oldman

Re: 'Real goju'? - 01/20/06 08:42 AM

harlan,
Next month I hope to have 2 Goju guys visiting me. It reminded me of an old joke.

How many Goju practitioners does it take to do a kata?

Answer? 8

1 to demontrait it and 7 to say " In our School we....."
Posted by: cxt

Re: 'Real goju'? - 01/20/06 10:03 AM

harlan

This may be more info than you asked for---but you did ask

The problem is that Miyagi had a number of students and the guy that probably would have taken over for him as the effective "head" of Goju was killed in WW2.

Miyagi seems to have taught in the "old style" where he taught the same kata to different people in slightly differnt fashion--kinda tailored to each person individual needs--their specific strengths and weaknesses.

Which is pretty much how all karate training used to be done--and one reason why you see so much variation in karate as a whole.

After they mastered the system each student then kinda went their own way--set up their own organizations etc.

(I don't think any did so while Miyagi was alive)

So each group of Okinwan goju is doing thing a bit differently.

And the Japanese goju guys are doing things "their" way as well.

The difference range from very minor to significant.

All can be broadly classified as Japanese or Okinawan, and all are doing things close enough to the "same" to see whom trained with whom.

Best I can do is say that the differences your looking at are probably "standard" withen the specifc goju organization that the performes belong too.

And they probably all fit the "umbrella" standard of "goju."

But there is really no "uber" standard for goju.
Posted by: Neko456

Re: 'Real goju'? - 01/20/06 01:42 PM

I think each system has a look and feel to it, Goju has a Okinawan Chinese look and feel thats different from the Chinese/Okinawan looking mulitple strike Kenpo/Kempo systems or the Japanese look of Shotokan. Within the flowing multiple strikes of Goju any one can take you out, the soft is as powerful if not more so then the hard. It doesn't do a lot of slaping yourself or reflective striking/checking like Kenpo. It doesn't do a lot of gentle lifting of the chin before the strike, Goju usually will strike between the chin opening and continue striking. It also seems to bump, pull, push, and hold on more then Kenpo/Kempo. I'd say Goju has less hip throwing motions then Kenpo and more leg sweeps/reaps and arm throws. Both are self defense systems rather then sport oriented, and like to joint lock.

Goju seems similar to Kenpo/Kempo without the gentle lifting motions, slapping themself and crab like rolling rotating strikes. It flows but its seems to be the difference between trad Wing Chun (too much trapping rather then hitting, going by Jessee Glover) and Juan Fa Gung-fu (where they change to more hitting and less trapping). Not an exact comparison but off the top of my head, its what I see.

I think the purest form of Goju-ryu being the ones that adheard to Miyagi's Katas and Higashionna's Katas. Which teaches this flow, look and feel. My system has these and add ons by Soko Toguchi.

CTX - Nice technical why?
Posted by: harlan

Re: 'Real goju'? - 01/20/06 02:13 PM

I would appreciate it if contributers to this thread stay on topic. I am NOT interested in any cross comparisons of guju and XXXart, and will request that the thread be locked it it looks like it is going to be derailed/hijacked.

Thank you.

My newbie radar tells me that folks learn kata, and then may teach the exact way of doing it to others...forming 'carbon copies'. When I see the same kata being done differently, I wonder...'Is one of these a personal version...and whose version is it?'
Posted by: cxt

Re: 'Real goju'? - 01/20/06 02:28 PM

harlan

Another difference is that most of the whats commonely called "koryu" kata (the "koryu" is used to denote the "old style" kata from what are called the "testing" kata)
is that the "koryu" kata are often done in a much more "flowing" manner.
With less attention on the laser-tight kime.

Ive heard people watching it as thinking the goju kata were being done in a "loose" or even "sloppy" manner.

Speaking just for the goju I am familier with--the stances tend to be higher with the only really deep stance being shiko-dachi--and that one is deeeeep.

I agree with Neko in that there is lot of holding, trapping, bumping, etc going on.

Aslo alot going on at the knee level.

As a very general rule--alot of goju tends to be constructed around a very close fighting range, also why that as a rule goju tends to chamber high and tight.

Posted by: Neko456

Re: 'Real goju'? - 01/20/06 04:07 PM

Sorry harlan I wasn't trying to side track the thread I was just adding to the technical that CTX stated about how it was taught to each pupil differently by Miyagi Sensei.

I was attempting tie together that the Katas gives each style its look and feel and how this differs from similar in ideal but different popular effective fighting arts.

Its hard for me to talk Kata without talking about flow and look and feel. Goju is a touchy feeliy art.

Each Instructor teaches a Kata a little different the standard floor pattern is the same almost, but the explained bunkia determines what may or may not be different. You see this alot in Goju-kia and Goju-ryu.

There should be no differences within kias or ryus, but I believe its the explaination of the techniques within, that changes the movement slightly. In some case its who was taught what and when.

Hopefully thats back on track.
Posted by: CVV

Re: 'Real goju'? - 01/21/06 03:54 AM

Generally speaking, you can divide Goju ryu into 2 sects.
The Okinawan and the Japanese sect. They are however deeply related.

I am only talking about the evolution as from Miyagi sensei. Not before. Miyagi sensei only ever gave teaching licence to 3 people : Seko Higa, Jinsei Kamiya, Jinan Shinzato. Of them only Seko Higa ever opened dojo and had an organization (Shodokan).
On the Okinawan side, after the death of Miyagi sensei, we have Meibukan (Meitoku Yagi sensei) Jundokan (Eiichi Myazato sensei) Shoreikan (Seikichi Toguchi sensei) and the Shodokan (Seko Higa sensei) as the most important lineages.

On Japanese side, there are roughley 2 major lineages, Goju-Kai (Yamaguchi sensei) and JKF Goju-kai (Shozo Ujita, Tomohoru Kisaki, Jitsei Yogi (Okinawan, senior student of Miyagi) and Kenzo Uchiage). Yamaguchi's major inluence after Miyagi died was Meitoku Yagi of the Meibukan. Within JKF Goju-kai mjor influence was Shoreikan of Seikichi Toguchi (early) and Jundokan of Eiichi Miyazato - Koshin Iha (later).
For any Goju school, you can track back it's lineage to these people in 99%. All of these people are dead except Koshin Iha (but he no longer teaches).

The IOGKF (as large world wide organization) is a spin-off of the Jundokan as is the YKKF of Ron Yamanaka. Non of these are currently affiliated to the Jundokan.

It is all 'real' Goju. The differences have to do with interpretations and how they were thaught by Miyagi sensei and in what time frame. Their curriculum is the result of their training and was developped after a long deliberation and study.

In the same way, my performance of kata is the expression of my experiences. For the most part, I follow the JKF Goju-Kai line but for certain details, I have other influences. They are my interpretations after 25 year of research and I consider it real 'Goju'.
Posted by: BrianS

Re: 'Real goju'? - 01/21/06 01:38 PM

Quote:

Newbie question: is there a 'standard' way of performing Goju kata, and where can one 'see' it? I've been looking at Goju kata online for a bit now, and each website seems a little different from each other, as well as different from what I learn. Is there a standard way of performing kata (and who does it) that is taught, or variations/personal interpretations of kata that can be considered 'acceptable'? (If yes...what are the criteria for acceptance?)

Thank you for feedback to the newbie.




To me the answer is no. You do goju kata the way you are taught and noone is taught exactly the same. When I saw Ed perform seiunchin I knew he did a diffeent goju than I,but still 'real' goju.
There are those who have alot of snobbery and will tell you there is only one way and one 'real' goju,but it isn't true to me. The actual performance of kata is only self expression.
Posted by: Neko456

Re: 'Real goju'? - 01/23/06 11:28 AM

Thats was interesting and I believe factual as history goes and I feel you on interpetation, examination and self expression (BrianS). I believe all versions of Goju are true because their base and lineage & look and feel, its never been just a sport base art and its stress is toward internal health(breathing) & self defense.

Some Kata look and feel stays pretty much the same as the original forms. Like ones added by Toguchi. They look like Gakisai da Ni and are named Gakisai da San and Yo, Gaikiha 1&2 prepares you for Seisan, & Sepia, Koukiha prepares you for Shishoshin and Kururunfa. I'd like to see's Meibukan's Turtle form and see how if its totally strays from the flow of the system or stays pretty much with the floor pattern and look/feel.

Urban's self expression Urban's Empi kata strays (IMO)from the floor plan but is still a good kata that practices elbows strikes, which are a ground floor plan of Goju's in fighting. So its still real Goju.
Posted by: oldman

Re: 'Real goju'? - 04/05/06 02:03 PM

http://proxy.ee.kent.ac.uk/~cpb2//Dentokan/Goju_Ryu/
Posted by: Ed_Morris

Re: 'Real goju'? - 04/05/06 07:28 PM

definitely not 'standard' Goju if there is such a thing. I'm not sure what influence it is but my guess is this person is a Shotokan stylist...or more likely multiple influences. It's almost like a Japanese Shorin stylist doing Okinawan Goju movements with over-exagurations in some parts. seems to be a bit off...anyone else notice some strange things with the kata? or is it just me?
Posted by: CVV

Re: 'Real goju'? - 04/06/06 04:05 PM

I suspect it's shoreikan (Seikichi Toguchi line).
Because of Kakuha kata.

Power is lacking in the 'finish' of the technique. I cannot see explosive power (fa jing) in his execution.
Smooth walking but he tends to 'reset' his front foot before stepping forward (see seiunchin). This is not as I am thaught. Moving should come from generating power through the hip.
His tora-guchi (mawashi-uke) is a bit short to my preference.
A bit monotoom in execution too, always same rythm in everything. Stances are pretty good, but transitions are too slow. Also misses muchime in the slow actions and chanchan in the fast actions.
Posted by: Ed_Morris

Re: 'Real goju'? - 04/06/06 04:41 PM

I don't think curriculum gives too much of a hint since who knows where people pick kata up. The toguchi line doesn't have that low of stances esp. in shiko dachi. constant rate of execution like you mentioned and lower stances tell me a modern shorin derived influence.
Posted by: oldman

Re: 'Real goju'? - 04/06/06 05:24 PM

http://www.dentokanhombu.com/lineage.htm
Posted by: oldman

Re: 'Real goju'? - 04/09/06 12:22 AM

http://youtube.com/watch?v=DF7qWz7cceE&search=karate
Posted by: bo-ken

Re: 'Real goju'? - 04/09/06 01:13 PM

That kata was well done.
Posted by: BrianS

Re: 'Real goju'? - 04/09/06 03:18 PM

The kata was well done. I don't recognize the kata 'tenchi' though. I'm certainly not the authority though.
Posted by: Ed_Morris

Re: 'Real goju'? - 04/09/06 07:15 PM

'tenchi' apparently is a kata that was created in the 70's by Meitoku Yagi in order to introduce students to goju's standard kaishu kata. other kata were added during the 80's and 90's. I've never heard of these till now. It's a different timeline of Meibukan. Anthony Mirakian learned the Goju kaishu kata curriculum from Yagi in the 50's and 60's...and as far as I know, didn't teach the 'newer' kata. I could be wrong on that.

What is considered the 'standard' syllabus of Goju are the kata as follows (the order in which they are taught vary between schools):

Sanchin & Tensho
Saifa
Seiunchin
Shisochin
Sanseiru
Sepai
Kururunfa
Sesan
Suparenpei

the general movements/embusen are similar between major Goju schools, but influence, emphasis, execution speed and interpretation vary widely. You could have one Goju school teaching kata with stylized form competition in mind, which generally is more popular with the Japanese versions of Goju...and then have another school teaching with a heavy influence of the Chinese Art aspect of forms - which is most likely the type of forms taught by Higaonna to Miyagi, Mabuni and Juhatsu Kyoda.

It's all 'real' Goju. Just depends what you want it to do and then find someone who teaches it that way.

The one thing all of the major schools don't dispute is that Miyagi himself taught all of the kata that I listed (but it's questionable if he taught any ONE person all of them). what IS disputed is which of those kata were taught to him by Higaonna...although Sanchin and Seisan are not disputed.

It's a complicated mess with so many variants, that I wouldn't even attempt to say which are 'more' goju than another.

sorry I couldn't help more...
Posted by: harlan

Re: 'Real goju'? - 06/17/07 05:27 PM

bump

'Real' goju. The more I see, the more elusive it seems to get. Looking to understand a little bit about 'chin na', and I 'see' Chin na in Saifa.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFAcPe8VPiA

There is another discussion on whether or not grappling is in karate; where to draw the line 'this is karate'. How about joint locks?
Posted by: SamW

Re: 'Real goju'? - 06/18/07 09:13 AM

Harlan, Chin Na is actually part of most chuan fa styles and is prevalent in crane systems. Since Goju's ancestry includes crane, it is only reasonable to see many chin na moves throughout goju. I have a feeling you already know this, but the newbie that posted the first question may not.

Many years ago, before I had looked into chin na, I used to say Goju had "ju jitsu like techniques". Then I found the joint locks, takedowns and throws were from something that predated ju jitsu and got my facts straight.

If you look into chin na from crane and tiger systems, you'll see many moves right out of different goju kata.

One comment on cxt's post- you can have hard kime AND still move in a flowing manner. There is no doubt watching may Sensei and some other senior practitioners you can have both.
Posted by: harlan

Re: 'Real goju'? - 06/18/07 09:29 AM

That hard kime and flowing at the same time...I attribute it to practice that includes 'stuff' (for lack of a better word...still a newbie at one year ) from CMA. Like Baqua, Tai Chi, etc. Kimo sensei introduced 'gong li' into our Goju practice. Learning about it was like having a mental key turned...
Posted by: harlan

Re: 'Real goju'? - 06/20/07 08:58 AM

Hmmm...reading over this thread, SamW's comment rings louder. With only a year or so of Goju now, I re-read the comments differently than the 'newbie' that made the original post. For one, CVV's term 'fa jing' totally went over my head a year ago. It's been a year of trying to wrap my brain around understanding the movement between stances/punches. 'What is it'...how to unpack and define this huge amount of information that I see happening in-between. I learned a new word this week that helps, 'fa jing', and it was here in this thread all along.

(Dumb newbie )

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxxebP0u31g
Posted by: SamW

Re: 'Real goju'? - 06/20/07 10:52 AM

Harlan,

Kimo Sensei is a wonderful teacher. The inclusion of Gong li is something I think can only benefit your goju. One of his students out here in Colorado, Ole, is fun to watch because of the effect the gong li has had on his goju.

As for fa jing, down the road you'll come to realize this is one of the many benefits of correct Sanchin training.
Posted by: harlan

Re: 'Real goju'? - 06/20/07 11:12 AM

Small world. See PM.