I hear you and I'm fascinated by your great analysis on cultural phenomena regarding these myths of important people. I just like use my brains a bit, even though I know it is somewhat irrevelant concerning Lee's heritage to the MA world. But it might tell something about his process and choices that influenced him. IF it wasn't a death by misadventure.
As for his cause of death, please read this:
http://www.bruceleedivinewind.com/death.htmlAs for Lee's great energy, I also would suggest people to read his stuff and hear comments from people that really trained with him, instead of just hypothesing on the subject. He had this thing going from very early age, so his nickname was "never stays still". It's certainly a great motivational life story, no doubt about it. He also lived the life he lived largely because his tremendous energy.
I do not think that people should therefore see him as the ultimate standard in too many things. His unconformistic personal philosophy is especially interesting in that respect, because he always emphazised that "do not duplicate a successful personality, live your life instead to fit your dreams, capabilities and develop yourself without harmful external limits to your progress". His theme of constant growth can be clearly seen in his saying "flowing water never goes stale". Wiseguys have always commented that the idea of an ethical and a individualistic martial artist is a very controversial thing but I think Lee, as a chinese thinker, looked life as a whole. As a system of constant change. He was a very well educated man, who did't think that fighting arts exist for superficialty, like competition. He likened the role of teacher to "a sign pole for a traveller". This can also be seen in his disliking of teaching to large groups of people.
Inosanto btw taught one known finnish martial artist while travelling on the train during night. The student was totally affected by Inosantos working ethic, enthusiasm and need to be sure that his student can apply and really understands what he teaches. He actually told that Inosanto changed his whole thinking about martial arts, even thought they trained only for a relatively short time period. I think most people know to whom Inosanto credits much of his work ethic.
It has been said many times that Lee's training loads weren't so impressive by today's sport science standards. Instead he wanted to test things to fit his needs. So he kind of HAD to overtrain to achieve this. He concentrated his energy on the methods, being an academically educated philosopher. If some sportmen have trained successfully in a certain way, why shouldn' it work for anyone else as well? Were the methods they going to help me or not? How can I know it? How can I measure it? And most importantly, how far human body can go, if the vast limitations of mind are conquered? For Lee, training was the whole process, not just one nice looking and feeling part of it.