Yes, vulgarity from Cord, on top of name calling and swearing, good job. You know, kids may be on this sight and if I was a moderator I would deleat your last post.
Then fee free to report it. That is your right, your complaint will not be handled by me, and nor will I be treated with favouritism by the mod handling the complaint.
Of course, technicaly, all political discussion is against the rules on this site, so your multiple threads attempting to address poliitical agenda in mainstream movies are
all against code of conduct, and I could have deleted/locked them at any time. I do like a bit of freedom of speech here and there though- how about you?
Yes, we should give billions of dollars to Mexican criminal politicians so they can line their own pockets at the expense of their own people. The same criminal politicians in mexico who have created a climate that drives their people to cross a desert with violent criminals in order to escape the crushing poverty their politicians have created. I'm sure the money would be wisely spent.
Magnificent misrepresentation of the possibilities inherent in funding reform of the magnitute in this hypothetical situation. With the equivalent budget of the war plus homeland mexican border patrols, you could literaly rebuild the political infrastructure from the ground up, and ensure that the corruption was less blatant, less reckless, and more in line with developed countries democratic process.
How exactly is asking that people obey the law being a racist. I don't care if you come from Mexico, Ireland, Germany or Antarctica, just obey our laws to become a citizen, just like the people who are obeying the laws.
But the rules ensure that only those with money can come in. What use is a land of opportunity when it precludes that opportunity from those that need it?
I would have to say helping all of the screwed up countries around the world is something we have been reluctant to do, especially in the past.
The past is the past. This is simply not the case with modern America. Its true that you were reluctant to help allied forces fight Hitler until nearly half way through the war, and if it were not for Pearl Harbour, exactly how far you would have let him get with his plan we will never know, but thankfully your govt. got its act together in the nick of time.
Nowadays, its all about freedom for the middle east. You want to help these impoverished, undeveloped peoples, struggling under the yolk of unjust rule. You will throw the lives of the young to the winds like confetti in the name of freedom for people who culturaly neither want, understand, or appreciate a western concept of democracy. They dont want teen-pregnancy, Britney Spears, McDonalds or bubblegum. They do not see the west as having a blueprint for a better way of life.
So why 'help' those who never asked for it, nor even seem to want it?
It can't be because of compassion for your fellow man, I mean, after all, you have just acknowledged the crushing poverty and corruption that exists in Mexico, and you clearly couldn't give a cr4p about them.
Nor can it be because you disagree inherently with unjust dictatorship - because Mugabe has done 50 times the damage and horror that Saddam ever did, and your leaders will give that lunatic a belly-rub and a good hotel when he visits.
It is money well spent in the middle east.
So what's in the middle east that plucks at your heart strings? Oil? Strategic Military position?
On a machiavellian level, these are not unreasonable things to covet, but for goodness sake, dont try and sell the whole thing as an act of compassion, or as anything other than speculation for accumulation.
There is no book-profit in acts of genuine kindness, and that is why you will always make excuses for leaving Mexico poor and desperate, whilst charging in saving those who dont want a conditional freedom based on adoption of a culture foreign to them. That is Rome all over again, and as high as an empire rises, it is its nature to fall.