Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger?

Posted by: Benjamin1986

Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/08/05 01:10 PM

They threw baseball and softball out of the Olympics, the first games cut since rugby in '36. They will not be played in London in the 2012 games.

There has been talk in the past of cutting fencing from the games, citing poor attendance and practical untelivisability. (Is that a word?) I believe that it is European block alone that has kept fencing around (I know that most Americans don't give a care about fencing). Do you think that the sport will be cut soon? Why?
Posted by: JohnL

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/08/05 01:13 PM

No

It's one of the original sports in the Olymics and I believe that the number of countries involved will ensure it stays where it belongs.
Posted by: Yunsung

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/08/05 07:22 PM

There have been attempts to remove fencing from the pentathlon in recent years (replacing it with judo, etc.). None have been successful, and I imagine that fencing will remain for much the same reasons. It was one of the founding sports at both the 1906 (unofficial) and 1912 games.
Posted by: Belnick

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/10/05 05:42 AM

Quote:

They threw baseball and softball out of the Olympics, the first games cut since rugby in '36. They will not be played in London in the 2012 games.

There has been talk in the past of cutting fencing from the games, citing poor attendance and practical untelivisability. (Is that a word?) I believe that it is European block alone that has kept fencing around (I know that most Americans don't give a care about fencing). Do you think that the sport will be cut soon? Why?





I donno why they were cut, but I can only assume it was cus to few nation do them, I mean is it japan and USA that plays baseball ? it is the only countries I heard of that does
the sport is not even read about in schools
softball we did sometimes for fun, bt I never even seen a official competion for it in sweden

but fencing got alot of ppl participating from alot of diffrent countries, right ?

Quote:

No

It's one of the original sports in the Olymics and I believe that the number of countries involved will ensure it stays where it belongs.




umm, 776bc they fenced ?
did not know they made such blade then, or even that roman invented them
Posted by: JoelM

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/10/05 08:33 AM

Belnick, stop being an ass.

You know damn well they mean when the Olympics were re-started in the 1800s.

Stop arguing for the sake of arguing.
Posted by: Yunsung

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/10/05 11:59 AM

Spartans had a type of spear/sword fighting put into the original pentathlon in the 500's B.C., as I recall. So, yeah. It was actually part of the original Olympics, so far as the pentathlon was concerned.

Though I do seem to remember that the sword was only used in the event of the spear breaking. And the 776 B.C. Olympics consisted of one event, the straight 400 m dash.
Posted by: Iamdadude

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/10/05 02:18 PM

...and moderators are supposed to moderate cussing...
Posted by: freakyfencer

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/10/05 02:42 PM

This is from a Fencing Jokesite

This Parry Riposte's for You

As we all know, fencing is in BIG TROUBLE! Dark Forces are at work and fencing may be dropped from the Olympics. Now I know you're thinking: "Wait a minute! They're considering adding men's Freestyle Bungee Cord Jumping and women's Underwater Ultimate Frisbee to the next Olympics. How could they get rid of fencing?"

Well there exists an important market out there that really appreciates men being really manly and doing silly things like emulating yo-yos. This market also really supports any sport that involves women in swimsuits. It is this market that has so far ignored fencing, and to save our beloved sport we must bring fencing to the BEER DRINKING MARKET!

What is the difference between fencing and baseball, basketball, and football (outside the fact that fencing doesn't revolve around the possession of some spheroid piece of leather without any real practical value)? About a zillion bucks, lots of heavy steroid use, and the fact that FENCING ISN'T SPONSORED BY MICHELOB! We need to tap (so sorry) the beer-drinking sports fan's interest. Sadly this will probably require the use of cheerleaders (shudder!). Fencing needs name recognition!

We need to be sponsored by responsible corporations that promote safe driving while producing enough alcohol to stupefy every driver on the planet to the mental capacity of a houseplant. We need to have the Coors Light Foil Championships, the Miller Genuine Draft Epee Finals, and of course Budweiser sponsoring the Bud ALL-AMERICAN ALL-STAR MANLY SABRE MELEE!

Just think of it! Thousands gathered at Madison Square Garden to root on their favorite fencing teams, Everyone drunkenly doing the wave and spilling their beer ("Spill all you want, we'll brew more!") with every parry riposte. The fans would taunt the opposition fencers with cries of, "Hey fencer, fencer, miss that parry, hey fencer fencer..."

Every director's call would be greeted with a happy chorus of "PARRY RIPOSTE! ARE YOU BLIND! THAT WAS BEAT ATTACK ALL THE WAY, YOU JERK! KILL THE DIRECTOR!" Even more exciting is the prospect of the millions of drunken TV viewers screaming at their television sets with equal fervor.

During the televised matches really cool beer commercials would play where groups of sweaty and manly fencers (with flannel shirts and baseball caps thrown over their uniforms) would enter smoky and manly bars and say manly things like:

Mac: (In a very manly voice):

That was a heck of a prise-de-fer attack, Hank. Let me buy you an entire vat of beer.

Hank: (In an even more manly voice):

Thanks, Mac, but you better make it a vat of Miller Lite, I'm performing brain surgery on my own son in the morning.

(The men laugh in a very manly fashion and dump beer on each other.)

In the Budweiser commercials, sabre fencers would simply ogle women in swimsuits who would find the sabre fencers terribly interesting because they could still vaguely pronounce the word "Buuddd" while being three sheets to the wind.

So there you have it. Sure there will be sacrifices, like having to chew gum and spit all the time, and of course the silly nick-names like "BOOM-BOOM," etc. (which are so much easier for the besotted brain to remember). But this is a small price to pay for the survival of fencing.

So grab your flannel shirts and let's get to those bars for more research. Besides with a $100 million a year fencing contract you can retire early and take up another sport, like maybe bungee cord jumping...
Posted by: BuDoc

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/11/05 07:32 AM

I have no beef against fencing. I think it requires a high degree of skill and talent, and should definately be included in Olympic competiton.

However. The Olympics, I think, are supposed to have games/contests that represent a world population participation.

I have been many places in the world and you can always find kids willing to participate in a baseball/softball game, no matter where you are.

I rarely see kids fencing in the street. The sport is by far to elite. Too few coaches, too much equipment involved.

That is why you see such team games as soccer(futbol) and baseball in 3rd world countries. For a very minimum of inexpensive equipment, a whole lot of kids can play.

Hey Imadude- I think Joel was extremely moderate with Belnick. He could have said much worse

Page
Posted by: freakyfencer

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/11/05 12:22 PM

It may be in a sense an elitist sport, but it's one that has participation from the States as well as most of the European nations.I can understand them dropping something like Rugby as it doesn't have much popularity outside of Western Europe, but Fencing is practiced worldwide even if only by an elite few. As for Fencing in the streets, I did it with some friends in a parking lot on Fourth of July.
Posted by: hedkikr

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/12/05 03:27 AM

I think that fencing should remain especially when you have equestrian & sailing sports represented (both much more eliteist). Sport should be man vs. man. Bikes are OK because they require man-power. If sailing is allowed to remain, why not hang gliding or water skiing. Rythmic gymnastics & syncronized swimming??? What happened there? Archery not target shooting. Is Team Handball still in? If so, why not lacrosse?

I got a headache & the IOC got a problem w/ the definition of sport.

owari
Posted by: Benjamin1986

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/12/05 05:06 PM

Rythmic gymnastics and syncronized swiming both require significant physical and artistic ability by all involved, and target shooting requires perfect control of your body. You and I might not agree with them, but they are sports.

Budoc, I have heard it suggested that this was a jab at the US, which has dominated both baseball and softball games. Frankly, I wouldn't be suprised.
Posted by: hedkikr

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/13/05 01:37 AM

There was nothing in the Olympic rules that states that an included sport must be artistic. BTW, that's the same arguement used by those who wanted to include Ballroom Dancing as an Olympic sport (that it takes strength & stamina and is artistic: comparison w/ figure skating).

Can you say "slippery slope"?
Posted by: MAGr

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/13/05 12:12 PM

Isnt a sport a test of skill not artistry? Sometimes the definitions mix but ballroom dancing is not a sport, and neither is curling. I refuse to watch peole hurl a ball on ice, with two others sweeping the ice as the ball travels to a target that is bigger than a friggin helipad!

Fencing requires skill, and is a sport that is appreciated by many countries and nationalities. It is sword fighting for crist sake, which country does not have a sword as a weapon at one time or another? It should definetely stay in, and as for the elitist arguement....a horse is more expensive than a fencing suit.
As for baseball, that is a sport in which two countries in the entire Globe invest millions, and the rest nothing. So we might aswell not have any other competitors.

Quote:

umm, 776bc they fenced ?
did not know they made such blade then, or even that roman invented them



Dude, what an insult! the Olympics is a Greek 'invention'
Posted by: BuDoc

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/13/05 12:47 PM

I could definately see a jab being taken against the US in the world of politics that embroils the IOC.

it just doesn't make any sense. Well maybe we are a dominant force in softball, but baseball??

Japan, Cuba, Mexico,dominican Republic all do well in baseball. We didn't even take the gold in it last time

It would be nice to see what the exact criteria are for inclusion, and then see which sports qualify.

Page
Posted by: BuDoc

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/13/05 12:57 PM

I'm catching alot of $h!t for calling fencing elitest.

I didn't mean it in a bad way, I swear! I love fencing, I've got no beef with it.

However. fencing is not a readily available sport. Either is polo, any of the Equestrian games, target shooting, sailing, I'm sure there are others.

Hundreds of nations get to be represented in the Olympics. Many of them are very poor countries with very poor people. Very,very few of their population would ever get a chance to sample some of these events let alone, formally participate, let alone compete on an international level!

Thats all I'm saying.

Track and field, wrestling, swimming,,basketball, handball, soccer etc.etc. Very little equipment expense. And what little is required can be used by many.

Broader participation, less chance of being cancelled.

Page
Posted by: MAGr

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/13/05 01:10 PM

Just as long as we are in agreement over curling (*shudder*).

And the British people were so proud when the UK team won the olypic curling gold medal!! Awww...Bless!

Actually I would be very interested to find out what criteria is for sports being included/excluded
Posted by: oldman

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/13/05 01:26 PM

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Posted by: Warwolph

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/24/05 06:03 PM

*crosses fingers that they don't cut it* if they did, France and italy would lose alot of medals...
Posted by: freakyfencer

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/24/05 09:55 PM

Plus American Fencers are getting alot better.
Posted by: Warwolph

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/25/05 11:12 AM

Quote:

Plus American Fencers are getting alot better.


*ahem* oh sorry, did I laugh? didn't mean to. Yes, american fencers are getting better... but the problem is, it's not a national sport... whereas in france and italy, fencing is considered one of the 3 national sports.. There is also a difference in attitude (don't take this badly.. I know you all will) because Fencing, as you said, is an elitist sport in the US... But not in France! I have property in a small village of about 200 inhabitants that has a small gymnasium... and fencing is one of the very few sports that's taught in it on a weekly basis , so I can only deduce that people who fence in the US have a superior attitude... and the French guys don't... if you observed the olympics last year (in fencing), there was a frenchman got a broken sword right through his hand, and the american athlete was actually laughing at him, didn't apologise or anything, whereas (I have seen that same guy compete against a friend of mine) the frenchman will apologise if he hurts the other...... oh and btw, after a short break and a bandaged hand, the frenchman won against the american... don't underestimate the injured man!
Posted by: freakyfencer

Re: Olympic Sports: is fencing in danger? - 07/25/05 12:38 PM

I wasn't denything that the American Olympic Fencing team is full of Elitist jerks, I'm just saying they're getting better.