PP newby here.

Posted by: TeK9

PP newby here. - 02/11/06 03:37 AM

Hi I'm a practitioner of TKD. I don't really know much about PP except for the few MA documentories that have demonstrated it. I have some articles on geaorge dillman and ZI've seen his book at barnes and nobles. The techniques he used looked a lot like jujitsu techniques.

Gavin I've read in one of your post that PP can work for all styles and that it would benefit a person who has a good knowledge and understanding of there particular style. Does this mean I can learn PP on my own? Or do I need some formal training to understand it?

Ex: I am experienced TKD practitioner, if I were to pick up a book on shotokan I could easily understand the book. HOwever, if I were to pick up a book on Aikido, I would probably be better off with some formal instuctions before I begin with a book.

Would this be the case with PP?
Posted by: TeK9

Re: PP newby here. - 02/11/06 03:40 AM

If you dont mind I plan to ask my newb questions here, I read some of your post gavin and you seem fairly motivated when it comes to this subject, I figure you would be a good source of info for me. Sorry if my question will seem redundant, but I've read many post and most people post on here seem to have a strong understanding and I probably wouldn't understand the terms they are using when they are referring to meridians and section #'s for w/e PP they are referring to.
Posted by: Gavin

Re: PP newby here. - 02/11/06 04:31 AM

Tek, as with anything formal instruction is key. If you were after learning the Kyusho side of PP's (not my field of epxertise) which is all the fancy K.O's and TCM side of things, then formal instruction is definately the way to go. However if you're prepared to have a poke around of your own accord and don't mind a bit of investigating I'm sure we can atleast help you find a few ouchy points! Feel tree to ask any questions you want....chances are they'll be questions other people will want to know anyway!

Gav
Posted by: TeK9

Re: PP newby here. - 03/23/06 10:36 AM

From the advice I got from gavin and brians I've checked out Gearge Dillman. I've read his first book, the begginers book which talks about kata interpretation and pressure points. Very interesting stuff especially for me since I coe from a taekwondo background. We do not interpret our solo forms, we use mostly jujutsu/hapkido techniques for self defense. Also we don't focus on pressure points, mostly vital shots.

I've also just got my hands on Bruce Tegners: Self-defense, Nerve center and pressure points book, Earle Montaigue: Dim-Mak: Death pont striking book. I have yet to start reading them.
Posted by: Gavin

Re: PP newby here. - 03/23/06 10:57 AM

Great Tek.....glad its going well for you!

Gav
Posted by: BrianS

Re: PP newby here. - 03/24/06 03:21 AM

Maybe we can discuss some of the things you found out in the book?
Posted by: underdog

Re: PP newby here. - 03/24/06 05:14 PM

My original training was TKD and while I don't do that anymore, there are plenty of TKD people training PP. I think that what you will find is that as you increase your awareness of PP, you will find them built into your TKD and other techniques. If they are not obviously built in, you will find that you can improve them by adding PP. For example, if you take whatever your favorite wrist lock is, and apply the pressure from your grasp, focussing on PP, it will be more effective. You will have better control and easier management to get the turning in two directions and aim the energy where you want. I think of PP as a common denomenator.
Posted by: wristtwister

Re: PP newby here. - 03/26/06 09:11 AM

Probably the best information out there on PP is Erle Montaigue's stuff. His taiji boxing association is world wide, so you should be able to find one of his instructors somewhere near you for "real instruction".

He has both the best videos and printed material on the subject, and the biggest organization to help you utilize the teaching material.

Patrick McCarthy also has some good materials out there, so if you're going to "self teach" this stuff, read about 10 years worth of books on the subject and then find somebody stupid enough to let you damage their organs with pressure point strikes.

Kyusho jitsu strikes are advanced enhancements to good technique, not a substitute for it, so learn your art first, and then go searching for pressure point information.
There's nothing wrong with learning about them as you learn your technique, but learn it first and add the pressure points as you develop the accuracy to hit the tsubos with your techniques. You also have to learn how to stop the damage and resucitate your "victim", and in many cases, you can't stop the organ damage, you can only resucitate them, unless you're also an acupuncture specialist.

This stuff is dangerous if you don't have good instruction, to the point that some of the points even heart surgeons won't touch because it shuts down the body's systems. You might consider just sitting in a shed full of dynamite and playing with matches instead of this approach... at least if you kill somebody just trying something out, it'll only happen once.

Posted by: underdog

Re: PP newby here. - 03/26/06 09:32 AM

I agree that "in person" instruction can not be beat. My personal opinion is that the specific organization that provides the qualified instruction is less importan than that it be in person. Check with all the reputable organizations. There are imposters out there. This has been a problem in the organization that my school is associated with (Kyusho International).

I apologize for not being that familiar with California. I am from Massachusetts. If you check Kyusho International site, you can find a list of their qualified instructors and study groups. A K.I. is also building a program for distance learning which is good if you can't find something in person. At minimum, go to conferences.

Other organizations will also have a list of their legitimate instructors available on their sites. Dillman International is another. Poke around these posts and you will find others like Rick Moneymaker (yes) Dragon Society. The Euro guys are good but folks like Rick Clark, who has some cool books, don't have much for instructors in USA. They do visit.
Posted by: TeK9

Re: PP newby here. - 03/26/06 02:57 PM

Pessure Point arts seems to be the latest niche in the MA market. And people talk about sport tkd and grappling, someone should add up the revenue on these PP organizations.

Anyway guys, I'm not planning to self teach, I am just looking into this subject. To be honest I am not exactly sure it this stuff even works as good as it's advertised.So far I know about vital points but pp seems to be a more precise method of attacking. And I'm not a believer yet.

Someone mentioned accupuncture, well I know for a fact that accupunture works for some people and not for others. So that makes me wonder about pp. Besides right now I'm at the point where I like dealing with people who teach the art because they have a passion for it, not because they wanna make a buck off of it.

I'm just curious about wat this stuff is, so far I've read one book by George Dillman, and it's not like I bought the book, I down loaded it for free along with 4 other pressure point books. No way am I getting involved into a money hungry organization. I've read enough comments on this site to know about these things.

BrianS,

The Dillman book gave me insight to new approaches for the basic techniques, how they arn't just blocks and strikes but can be used for grappling and holds. I like the way the tecniques were presented seperately in application form, I am still not a big fan of putting them all together in a solo form though, I just feel using them seperatly is a far better way to teach a student rather than having them practice alone(solo patern). Because aplication requires a partner. And I just feel that its the best way to practice/teach self defense...with a partner.
Posted by: wristtwister

Re: PP newby here. - 03/26/06 05:18 PM

Tek9, you're right. The PP training is the latest panacea for everyone, and if you know what you're doing, they DO work, but like a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while, you can accidently kill someone trying pressure point strikes without proper training.

I don't actually endorse anybody's system of this, but you'll get a lot of this kind of training in Isshin Ryu karate, if there's a school near you. Some of the Shotokan schools have it also, but if you're looking for actual Dim Mak training, I suggest looking at Erle Montaigue's people. They seem to have the broadest reach of anyone with the right information. Rick Moneymaker's Dragon Society has a lot of good information too, but I'm not impressed with how they handle their organization. I sent them a membership check, and got a patch and one bulletin, and never heard from them again...(and we teach at the same martial arts camp).

You seem to have a reasonable approach, but like I said before, find a qualified instructor before you try any of the PP stuff. You can let the genie out of the bottle without meaning to, and unless you know how to make somebody grow new organs, you don't need to be damaging the ones they have.

Posted by: AgenT

Re: PP newby here. - 03/28/06 07:14 PM

You want to reallly learn how pp works? Sure you can get erles stuff, dillmans stuff is definatly not recommended however. The best way to learn how pp's and human body works is simply go to your local hospital, and find and talk to doctors or specialists in these 3 fields, cardio, muscle/skeletal,nervous system. A qualified doctor that knows about and uses physical triggers related to these things to cause things to happen, like say put pressure on carotid sinus to lower blood pessure, will know way more then a martial artist that sure may know about the areas and even how they work but probaby never has had to use them or knows what really happens and how bad it can be. Then go and apply that to your martial art, mainly just that knowledge reversed. TKD being mainly a foot system the area's you'd strike to be effective would mostly be nerves, like sciatic, solar plexus, vegus etc. as one kick to any of these targets Will put someone out if done correctly. Even if you rely on books its still advisable to go to a hospital and cross reference them, there is alot of bs about the effectivness and even the points namely dillmans stuff.
Posted by: Gavin

Re: PP newby here. - 03/29/06 04:41 AM

In my experience both Doctors and holistic therapists (ones outside of MA's) are only useful for telling you the effects of a particular area or point...all information that you can get from a book. You need an experienced MA's to tell you how to attack that specific point. Most health practitioners don't ever consider how to attack the body as this is the reverse intention of what they have dedicated their study too. Knowing the effect of a strike is nice, knowing how to stirke is essential....that you ain't gonna get from a Doctor. So my advice is that if you want to learn how to attack the body, go to a MA school!
Posted by: underdog

Re: PP newby here. - 03/29/06 08:33 AM

Absolutely and think about it! PP is one part of a martial art. If you wanted to learn any other part of MA, you'd learn from martial artists. If you want to punch, do you go to a physicist?
Posted by: wristtwister

Re: PP newby here. - 03/29/06 11:31 PM

The biggest misconception out there is that PP training is a substitute for technique. If your technique sucks, you're not likely to get close enough to use PP techniques.

I did a demonstration to a class one time that depending on PP techniques alone might get you hurt worse than knowing nothing about them. One of the other instructors attacked me using a pressure point technique on my arm, which I promptly trapped and put him into nikkyo and onto his face in one movement. His attack was a strike, and I trapped his wrist using the crease of my elbow and simply rolled my hips around and it floored him so fast he almost smashed his face on the floor.

PP work great, if you know your stuff, but it's like the superman suit... you have to have the pants and shirt to go with the cape if you're going to fly...

Posted by: TeK9

Re: PP newby here. - 03/30/06 01:15 AM

Point taken, I guess you saved my younger brother, he was going to be my guinni pig (lab rat).
Posted by: shoshinkan

Re: PP newby here. - 03/30/06 04:16 AM

Quote:

Point taken, I guess you saved my younger brother, he was going to be my guinni pig (lab rat).




I was a younger brother once, fun eh...........

In all seriousness do some theory work, condition your tools a little and get to soemone who knows what they are doing for instruction.
Posted by: wristtwister

Re: PP newby here. - 03/30/06 07:53 PM

Tek9,
I'm well acquainted with pressure points, and their applications. What many instructors fail to teach, simply because they don't know, is that whatever damage you start with striking a pressure point doesn't necessarily heal itself just because you resucitate the victim.

When I'm teaching them, I relate them to being like an "unopened e-mail" in the organs. Eventually, they cause the damage they were designed to do, and unless someone uses curatives (acupuncture, potions, healing herbs) it just continues to cause and allow the organ to degenerate.

One of the pressure points that is used most of the time for demonstration knockouts is directly over the vagus nerve, which connects to every organ in the body. A strike there, can cause non-repairable injuries to any number of the organs in the body. If you question that, ask a surgeon about hitting the vagus nerve and its results during surgery.

While Kyusho Jitsu is the current "title" of pressure point studies, it is actually "methods of hitting the body". There are studies that hit the raised points,some hit the cavities, and others hit specific tsubos that cause reactions that are used in many martial arts as "set up points", so everyone in martial arts uses PP techniques of some sort all the time.

There are "nerve" techniques, "blood" techniques that attack the veins and artery structure, and specific attacks to "balance points" used to disrupt someone's balance.

To think that you are going to be so sophisticated as a newbie as to be able to strike points the size of a quarter "on demand" is pretty ambitious. The right way to study pressure points is to develop your martial arts skills and add that knowledge as you progress, so you know what's available when an opening occurs. It adds a lot to your karate and jujitsu training, and it's something that you will want to learn as your skills develop.

One of my grips in jujitsu has been developed so that I grab a series of nerve points when I do the same technique as the aikido class... the difference (from talking to the students) is that they are in pain as soon as I touch them and all the way through the technique.

I don't discourage PP study, just understand that the "pop version" of it is dangerous, and these cumquats that are going around punching tsubos on "sitting ducks" can be killing them without knowing it by failing to provide their victims with proper aftercare. I don't think anybody that has truly studied dim mak claims all the "legendary" stuff about it, but it is a real art and it does contain dangerous techniques that are "delayed time bombs" if they are done correctly. Like explosives, "it's not the dynamite that causes the problem... its the explosion that comes along with it."

Posted by: TeK9

Re: PP newby here. - 03/30/06 08:15 PM

Man oh man, last week we decided to pay the extra $10 bucks for an extra 60 channels to our 520 satellite channels. ONe of the new channels is the national geographic on 194. Anyways what luck I had this morning when I got up and saw this documentory titled "Superhuman" what luck, Mr. Dillman was on a bunch of his followers/associates deomonstrating pressure point and their concepts of chi/ki. According to this documentory chi/ki does not exist and soe xperiments where done to prove that it can not be scene using the tools of science.

What got me thinking was here wa a man (Dillman) who is respected by many whenit comes to kata deciphering and pressure point fighting and now here he is doing a seminar with what looks like Wally Jay's son, Lean Jay. And they are supposevely knokcing people out with CHI BLASTS. Invisible CHI BLASTS none the less. Did I miss something?
Dill man however, was doing it from behind a curtain which his students would hold up to seperate Dillman from his students whom which he was performing his no touch knock out technique.

Well a psychologist and a scientist got together and just thought this was completely rediculous and they decided to let these chi master test out thier technique on them.

Um did I mention all these guys where wearing gi's with huge Lean Jays.com and Dillman.com patches on their backs.

Anyway suffice to say that the no contact chi attack technique did not work on the willing scientist and when Mr. Dillman was asked to give a respose as to why it did not work. He said this "the guy was a complete non believer", "I don't like to say this a lot on t.v. but if the guys tounge was positioned in a certain way, the technique wont work, also if the guy had one big toe pinned to the ground and the other big toe pointed up it, my chi techniques wont work, because he will block the chi"

This is mind boggleing, I am so glad I did not buy his freakin book but instead down loaded that sucker for free from a torrent site.
Posted by: wristtwister

Re: PP newby here. - 03/30/06 10:44 PM

Don't judge everybody by any one person. Not everybody is running a medicine show.

Pressure Points are for real, and they work. I saw Master Odo knock people silly using them, and he never looked like he weighed 100 pounds on his best day.

Like "small circle jujitsu", and Prof. Wally Jay, Dillman found something that was unusual in the martial arts and capitalized on it. As time has progressed, however, he has continued to expand on his claims and "mystic powers" demos until very few actually take him seriously any more.

His written material isn't too bad, but you still need a competent instructor to show you what angles to hit the points and to teach you the sequences that do the most damage if you're seriously interested. If not, read a book on Anime'.

Just as your skeptical professors found him "incredible", there are studies that have been done that show properties of ki as measured in electrical energy and thermal photographs that display its effects that are credible. As I said, don't judge everyone by any one person.

Everybody using them doesn't attribute their "power" to magic... they just seem to work that way...

Posted by: BrianS

Re: PP newby here. - 03/30/06 11:05 PM

Tek,

Regarding Mr.Dillman. His pp methods do work to an extent the way they are supposed to. He just recently got into this chi-crap and my only guess is that he's a victim of his own success or ego. Maybe he's just lost it?
Posted by: Gavin

Re: PP newby here. - 03/31/06 04:15 AM

Quote:

Maybe he's just lost it?




Too much PP work maybe????
Posted by: underdog

Re: PP newby here. - 03/31/06 12:43 PM

I believe that episode of National Geographic has been well trashed already on another thread complete with clips for those who haven't seen it. Let it be. There are so many good sources of info posted in this thread, let that one bad example be. To resurect it polutes my tiny piece of the forum.
Posted by: wristtwister

Re: PP newby here. - 03/31/06 11:12 PM

Quote:

He just recently got into this chi-crap




To start with, I agree that what is going on in the "demo" circles is a lot of "smoke and mirrors", but I pull up short of calling it "chi-crap". There are some scientific studies that have been done on ki and they are validating a lot of formerly unproved theories about it. As for being able to project or "throw" ki, I've never seen anyone that could do it and prove results from it, although I have "blocked without touching" on a few occasions that left both me and my training partner at the time scratching our heads. It wasn't something that was planned.

I have an old translation of a Chinese book on Dim Mak that has a printed warning about Chi training based on the book of medicine from the "Yellow Emperor", part of which was apparently burned before being saved from a fire. In it, the pratitioner was warned that chi practice should be conducted inside of a stone building to prevent injury. It was quite explicit that "simply waving the hand" could kill if the sense of chi projection was properly trained.

Since everything else in the book has worked as advertised, I would hesitate to test this theory, because I wouldn't want to injure someone or kill them if it did work as they say it will. One of the skills you learn in true kyusho jitsu is something called "focused hitting", where only light brushing of the target is allowed, and if your chi and breathing are correct, you will have bruising on the area even if lightly touching one another with your techniques.

A lot of the "showmanship" done on the demos is BS, but in the real world of PP striking, the effects and damage caused using chi are well known.

Posted by: TeK9

Re: PP newby here. - 04/01/06 02:14 AM

None the less, Mr. Dilman is still a big figure when it comes to pressure points. And although this NG documentory made his teachings/ideas look foolish. He's still one if not the biggest authority on the subject. I'm a newb and when I look for sources of info, the majority of books published on PP are by Mr. Dillman.

I don't want to upset underdog by bringing the subject up, but as someone who is interested in this subject and before I start spending money on it, by purchasing books or seeking professional instruction, I'd like to find out the validity of Mr. Dillmans response as to why his techniques failed to work.

He mentioned about the scientist not being a "beleiver" and perhaps having his tounge in a certain position. Also he made comment on big toe positions.

Has anyone ever heard of these kind of methods for warning or protecting yourself from chi/ki attacking techniques?

Now he may have been desperte to come up with an answer, but let's give him some credit, he is a reputable authority on this subject matter. Perhaps what he says is true?
Posted by: underdog

Re: PP newby here. - 04/01/06 10:46 AM

I am actually pretty well tied in with Master Dillman. I owned all of his videos, DVDs and books except that I just donated them to my school library. I have seen Master Dillman many times and I have been to his Martial Arts Training Camp in Pa. U.S.A.

His student, Master Evan Pantazi is one of my teachers. My school is affiliated with Kyusho International, which is his organization.

I wasn't intending to sound negative towards Master Dillman, nor towards anyone. Master Dillman, in my opinion,is a genious and many of us wouldn't be studying pressure points if it weren't for his work, and his ability to bring it within reach of the rising martial arts student, and even to me, who will never rise very far.

I just believe that the forums should be a healthy place for exchange of ideas, both negative and positive so that together, we can learn. When the discourse procedes in a productive way, and ideas and opinions continue to be shared, that is a good thing.

When individuals are being trashed in a destructive way, long after their shortcomings have been appropriately exposed, then one has to ask what is the point. I felt pain for Master Dillman in that episode. While I can learn from what went wrong, I do so all the while knowing that I am not fit to dust his bookcases. When last I sat in a seminar where he was presenting and he looked at me and chose to discuss the topic I suggested, while I was not even wearing his D.I. patch anymore, I was honored.

I may have jumped in too soon or preemptively to your post. It must be my martial arts training. I am new at this moderator thing. My interest was to keep the thread productive and comfortable. The tenor right now seems fine and I have no issue. If I anticipated your direction wrongly, then I do publicly apologize. Still, please regard the thread on the NG episode. One would have to have quite an imagination to have an opinion not already posted there.
Posted by: Gavin

Re: PP newby here. - 04/03/06 05:57 AM

Ooooo Chi projection again. Most, if not all of you, know my personal opinion of what is going on in the NTKO demo's that come out of the mainstream MA organisations, so I won't rehash those here. There are many aspects to the human mind that we don't understand. Intention and visualisation techniques are used to enhance performance in both in western and eastern sports, medicine, martial arts, etc, where and what do you think the phrase "power of the mind" comes from? How many times have you been told when hitting the pads "hit through the target", some call this intention some will call it Chi projection, either way it works and people using intention based techniques has had a proven track record.

Now my personal opinion on what is happening is neither here nor there, Chi Projection though is one *possible* answer. If you follow this train of thought you'll start thinking, "Ok, if I projecting my Chi and my punch is getting harder....surely I must be channelling my bodys Chi out of my arm!". A fair and logical train of thought. Now the next reasonable thought could be "Perhaps, if I really try I can make my Chi extend out past my arm!"....then you start talking to the rest of your dojo buddies about this and its all a relational train of thought and all start convincing each other that something should happen....bada bing, the power of the mind now makes something happen....trouble is, and I believe this to be the case in a large amount of NTKO demo's that its the power of the receivers mind that makes it happen, not the person supposedly doing the NTKO. I beleive pretty much religously that these literally knock themselves out.

Now don't get me wrong, I've heard some stories (some from very respected guys) about strange stuff happening. I myself have experience some weird stuff through my shiatsu studies.....but the mainstream people who do these demo's don't train like the people who I'm talking about. At best they usually teach some half arsed qi gong exercise that is practiced for 10 minutes at the beginning of a lesson, students get a nice tingly feeling in their hands or body and start using this "energy". The guys I've heard about and experience do a hell of a lot more than 5 minutes of exercise a day, and its not just simple qi gong. And what stuff they can do is only as a result of decades of training.

I'm randomly ranting here.....I shall mod slap myself!!! BAD GAV, BAD BAD GAV!!!!

Gav

PS. Do I get todays award for most pointless post of the day thus far???
Posted by: wristtwister

Re: PP newby here. - 04/03/06 06:42 PM

Gavin,
for the most part, I agree with you. I'm always seeing people who are supposed to be "throwing ki" at someone, but I've never seen them be able to affect me with their dynamic. That being said, I have "blocked without touching" before, and have no explanation for it.

If I thought I could repeat it at will, I'd be teaching seminars on it, and so would people who have much more knowledge about karate and jujitsu than any of us... which leads me to fall right in line with your thinking. It's one of those "if you can't prove it, it's not provable, so don't boast about it".

Luckily, I've seen people such as Master Odo and know several of his students in this country, and he was (if I remember correctly, Mr. Dillman's teacher). I never saw him do "no touch" anything, but I saw plenty of "dynamic" in his techniques and teaching. The guys I've trained with from his group, are all really good Okinawan karate players, but I haven't seen any of them doing this NT stuff either. They might kick through you or punch through you, but they depend on blunt force trauma, which is what karate is designed to deliver.

Pressure points are simply a "special targets" type of training, and the selection of the points to be struck are clearly creating a calculated objective when struck correctly... but I still have to see the guys who can do this stuff find somebody that has no martial arts knowledge or "resistance" that they can do it on. I guess I just never saw the reason for knocking out somebody that's just going to stand there and let you do it.

I tend to put them in the "terminally stupid" category...

Posted by: Gavin

Re: PP newby here. - 04/04/06 05:10 AM

100% agreed!