Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0

Posted by: Victor Smith

Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 09/26/06 05:52 AM

There must be a contest to see who puts the last video record of the arts out on the nets.

If we want to talk Crane, Matayoshi Shimpo is the man.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=encHYcCQgxc&mode=related&search=
Posted by: Ed_Morris

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 09/26/06 07:38 AM

..just wait till the flood of 'channan' kata videos hit the market.

see, they've got smarter - since it's channan (a lost kata), people don't have anyone legitimate on film to compare to. When they made the crane videos, they only looked at an aging H. Soken and forgot about Matayoshi.
Posted by: Victor Smith

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 09/26/06 08:27 AM

Hi Ed,

Of course in fairness, Matayoshi's crane lineage is different from Soken's.

As for Channan, there are already plenty of 'lost' kata cropping up everyplace. Kanazawa Sensei reportedly is selling video of an old Okinawan crane from he once studied.

The key for all kata is do they really express an underlying body usage to support the form. Many of the lost forms haven't come from sources where the instructor spent decades on the form themselves, and a large something remains lost, IMO.
Posted by: harlan

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 09/26/06 08:29 AM

I love watching Matayoshi. Thank you, Victor.

There is a saying, that Matayoshi was a 'quietly revered Goju man'. I see the little bits, here and there, of his family style, the crane stuff, and the more 'Chinese' style of Goju...and I think that he really 'knew'.
Posted by: CVV

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 09/26/06 04:51 PM

His father, Shinko Matayoshi was a good friend of Miyagi Chojun. They once did a dmonstration together for the Japanese crown prince I think.
Shinpo Matayoshi learned his hakutsuru kata (2) from Gokenki. His link with Goju is also with the dojo where he instructed when he returned from Japan to Okinawa. It was in the dojo of Seko Higa (student of Higashiaonna and of Miyagi, one on of the only 3 people to ever get a teaching licence from Miyagi concerning goju-ryu kenpo).
Matayoshi however has never thaught goju-ryu. There is refernce to the Matayoshi family karate style as kingai-ryu but I think this is only a partial story to their family style. His father learned in China a fighting style either from a man called Kingai or the style was nominated kingai in Chinese, do not know the exact story anymore.
There is a good DVD from 'rising sun productions' (www.risingsunproductions.net). The video extract at the start of this thread comes from there.

I know he thaught his hakutsuru to some students. My first kobudo teacher learned from Kenyu Chinen (lives in France) who learned from Matayoshi. Although I never realy studied the hakutsuru kata I remember that in the beginning sequence, the whipping open hand strikes were done with the fingertips, not in a nukite (spear hand) but in a rather loose way, like striking of the feathers of a wing. It is the ultimate soft technique.
When you look at the Alexander kata, it seems not soft enough.
Posted by: Victor Smith

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 09/27/06 08:20 AM

cvv,

I'm in total agreement with you.

One of my friends, from Cambridge, Mass. USA, trained with Matayoshi Sensei and does a spectular Hakutsuru kata.

The Matayoshi empty hand arts are most definately from Chinese origins, for I've seen the video tapes you reference.

But I think his kobudo forms are more well known.

pleasantly,
Posted by: Mark Hill

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/03/06 08:36 PM

Quote:

cvv,

I'm in total agreement with you.

One of my friends, from Cambridge, Mass. USA, trained with Matayoshi Sensei and does a spectular Hakutsuru kata.

The Matayoshi empty hand arts are most definately from Chinese origins, for I've seen the video tapes you reference.

But I think his kobudo forms are more well known.

pleasantly,




Didn't Matayoshi's progenitor's train in Kingai-ryu, a "sister" style to Pangai Noon ryu? (That's what mark Bishop's book says, I think). Would there be a crane connection here?
Posted by: harlan

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/03/06 08:45 PM

I've been told by my teacher that the tapes differ slightly from what Matayoshi 'showed' to individuals. I've asked about learning Kingai, Matayoshi family style before. I would certainly like to know who teaches it.
Posted by: Victor Smith

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/03/06 11:18 PM

I'm really only 3rd or 4th hand about Matayoshi, but as I understand it for almost all (if not all) public performances he would change his form(s), so no one could 'get it'.

Old style,
Posted by: Ed_Morris

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/04/06 02:06 AM

...and I hear (2nd hand) he often had a sense of humor about it...which, you know I can respect greatly.
Posted by: carlo

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/04/06 09:51 AM

Hi all,
I am writing from Italy (so please excuse my English !).
Anybody knows George Alexander (he claims to be a Matsumura Seito Shorin Ryu expert) ? I have practiced for a couple of months in a dojo linked with him, but I am not sure if their system is genuine ! It seems to me a "mixture" of Karate, Ju Jitsu, Kick Boxng etc. and, moreover, very..."commercial".
Is he really an expert of Hakutsuru and White Crane as he said ?
Thank you

Carlo
Posted by: shoshinkan

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/04/06 10:17 AM

If the dojo is very commercial it isn't somewhere I would want to train.
Posted by: Tsuruken

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/04/06 10:00 PM

Sorry but "Hakutsuru" is a very 'Karatefied' version of traditional White Crane with little to no real link to the real art IMHO.

The structure, concepts and general principles are very far removed from "Hakutsuru"
Posted by: Ed_Morris

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/04/06 10:40 PM

...and wait wait don't tell me...you know the 'real' one?
Posted by: Tsuruken

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/06/06 01:17 AM

No, sorry, just a seeker like everyone else!
Posted by: Mark Hill

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/07/06 09:06 PM

Quote:

Sorry but "Hakutsuru" is a very 'Karatefied' version of traditional White Crane with little to no real link to the real art IMHO.

The structure, concepts and general principles are very far removed from "Hakutsuru"




How, may I ask?
Posted by: Tsuruken

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/07/06 10:53 PM

Hi Mark,

Good to see a fellow Aussie here. Where in Oz are you located?

To answer, I only have my personal experiences and research over some 35 or so years to go on so I'm not going to claim that I "know" anything of any real value here.

Prior to converting to Chinese White Crane I was I guess a relatively so-called "high Dan Rank" (whatever that may mean!) in the "Hakutsuru-Related" arts of Matsumura Seito Shorinryu, Butoryu and Konan-Ryu Kohokan. I had learnt a number of "Hakutsuru" forms whilst on Okinawa.

Basically these forms were Karatefied embodiments of so-called White Crane. As I was later to discover after my involvement in Chinese Baihequan and in particular the Minghequan (Calling Crane) that the principles and concepts of same just did not match up with that of the "Hakutsuru" I learnt.

There was none of the KoonKor/Chuan Li (Poems of the Fist) such as Sink, Swallow, Float and Spit, as well as Pouncing, Lifting , Springing, Rebounding, the Five Elements etc evident in the "Hakutsuru and Karatedo I'd previously been exposed to.

In addition the actual forms and inherent techniques were totally different. It may be my lack of knowledge or low skill but I could not make a connection between the two.

All in all it is my humble opinion that the two ("Hakutsuru" and Chinese White Crane) are not connected in any real viable way.

Please keep in mind that this is my humble opinion only.

Thank you for the discussion.
Posted by: Mark Hill

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/09/06 06:08 AM

If they are simply different forms with the same name then there is actually no question as to their legitimacy, only their reputation.

If they are related, why is one transmission method (China-->us today rather than China-->Taiwan-->Okinawa-->us today) more valid than another?
Posted by: Tsuruken

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/10/06 02:11 AM

Hi mark,

I guess that the differences lay in the fact that certain aspects have been removed (principles, concepts, cultural aspects, traditions etc) in those versions who lay claim to have originated in the Chinese forms.
Posted by: Ed_Morris

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/10/06 02:13 PM

on what basis can you say that as 'fact'? what are you comparing to and what is it's exact source?
Posted by: Tsuruken

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/10/06 10:21 PM

Hi Ed,

How are you? Well I hope.

Perhaps "fact" was the wrong word to use here.

Perhaps I should have said in my own "experiences" having made a long study of "Hakutsuru" including learning the forms on Okinawa and of my experiences in Chinese White Crane under the guidance of Great Master runa Dong of Fuzhou China who is our Technical Master/Advisor.

Ed I am simply basing my views on my experience and on-going research of same. I am certainly no "expert!" "X" is an unknown factor and "spurt" is a drip under pressure
Posted by: CVV

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 10/22/06 04:20 PM

Well whatever hakutsuru might or might not be,
the hakucho kata's Shinpo Matayoshi performs, he learneed from Gokenki. Gokenki was a chinese martial artist orginally from Fuzhou who lived in Naha from somewhere 1912 till his death in 1940. He was a white crane master and infuenced Chojun Miyagi, Kenwa Mabuni, Shinpo Matayoshi, Kyoda Juhatsu and many others. Versions of hakucho, nepai, happoren, rokkishu are said to come from him His Chinese name was Wu Xiangui. Another Chinese expert was To Daikin. He was a tiger fist specialist and lived in the same area around that time. They teached in the Karate Kenkyu club in the 1920'ies. Other participants were Norisato, Seko Kina, Chomo Hanashiro, Choyu Motobu.
This part of the karate history, linking it directly to white crane and tiger fist kungfu is documented first handed by whitnesses and students from that area. If this influnece was directly 'imported' on Okinawa in after 1905 (the boxer revolution, where many masters fled the area of southern China), I am sure there must have been some contact with it before 1900 in China (Fuzhou).
References from the bubishi date from before the English occupation or the Chinese cultural revolution. So it might be that they no longer exist in China today.
Posted by: harlan

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 07/23/07 02:12 PM

bump

Matayoshi teaching student
Posted by: harlan

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 03/05/08 08:12 AM

bump

New youtube sighting. Excellent video quality of Matayoshi Shinpo performing Kingai Ryu. Filmed by Patrick McCarthy at the Kyoto Butokuden c.1994.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89_cUe-Sjkk
Posted by: SNieves

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 03/07/08 10:44 AM

Woah. I see elements of Uechi Sanchin, Seichin Seisan, Sanseiryu and possibly Kanshu in that last kata posted. Very nice execution by Matayoshi. OSU!

Quote:

bump

New youtube sighting. Excellent video quality of Matayoshi Shinpo performing Kingai Ryu. Filmed by Patrick McCarthy at the Kyoto Butokuden c.1994.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89_cUe-Sjkk


Posted by: Victor Smith

Re: Matayoshi 1 Alexander 0 - 03/07/08 08:54 PM

Hi Narda,

Great find, I have the same kata from a different performance venu with a different angle. The two together explain a lot about the form.