The
Spiritual Sword of Tamiya ryu:
Interview with Michael Alexanian Sensei
June 23, 2000
(Part 1)
By Deborah Klens-Bigman
Editor's Note: This interview
provides a unique glimpse into the ancient tradition
of iaijutsu -- the art of drawing and cutting with
a Japanese sword, a razor sharp curved blade that
requires tremendous skill and strength for proper
control. The interview covers many subjects including:
history of the art, practice of kata, methods of transmission
of knowledge, kata applications, and training in Japan.
Introduction:
One doesn't expect to encounter traditional
Japanese culture in America's Heartland, but that's
what you find in a quiet, residential neighborhood
in East Lansing, Michigan. In an old house, built
by his father, Michael Alexanian lives with his wife,
Dianne. Together they are directors of Shakunage Consulting,
Inc. The company's mission is to "promote, nurture
and develop awareness of Japanese Culture" through
the study of various Japanese arts and traditions
(www.shakunage.org).
The house is filled with Japanese art objects, surrounded
by a beautiful Japanese garden.
On the grounds one also finds the Shakunage Tei,
a small pavilion which serves as a classroom for traditional
arts - flower-arranging, tea ceremony, calligraphy.
The Shakunage Tei also serves as the dojo for the
North American branch of Tamiya ryu Iaijutsu, a classical
koryu (classical) style of swordsmanship.
I first met "Mike Sensei" at the Guelph
(Ontario) School of Japanese Sword Arts, a sort of
"summer camp" for people interested in getting
a sample of various traditional Japanese blade arts.
His friendly manner put me at ease and we got along
well from the start. I was also impressed with the
way he wore formal keikogi (martial arts uniform jacket)
and hakama (skirt like pants with seven pleats, traditionally
used by the Japanese warrior class and later adopted
within martial arts) for the Saturday night demonstration
(elegance is not something often encountered in martial
arts).
Intrigued, I took a seminar in Tamiya ryu Iaijutsu
one year at Guelph, and found there was a lot that
was of interest to me as a practitioner of Muso Shinden
ryu iaido (iaido like iaijutsu is the art of drawing
the sword but with greater emphasis on spirutal goals).
Tamiya ryu is an earlier style than ours, but is considered
to be part of our line of development. I could see
a number of similarities between the two styles in
the way the sword was drawn and handled.
In November of 1999, my instructor Phil Ortiz and
I visited Mike Sensei and Dianne in East Lansing,
where we spent the weekend training and talking (and
watching martial arts videos). The following summer,
in June, I asked Mike Sensei if he would sit for an
interview, which he did.
The Interview
Deborah Klens-Bigman: The first thing I wanted
to ask is if you could give us an overview of your
experience in martial arts practice
Michael Alexanian: I began about 11 years
ago, in 1989, studying Toyama Ryu Batto Jutsu or Toyama
Ryu Iaido, as it is sometimes known. It's an interesting
story as to how it all came about. The Christmas of
1989 my wife gave me a set of katana (Japanese swords)
and wakizashi (a short sword-like knife) for display
in our home. I had always been fascinated with military
arts, even when I was a child, reading The Legends
of King Arthur, and about samurai and things like
that. So she got me this very beautiful set of swords,
and a gentleman who was doing some gardening for us
happened to notice them in our home. He had seen a
little flyer on a kiosk at nearby Michigan State University
advertising a Japanese sword club. Out of curiosity
I went one night, and that was it: I got hooked, as
often happens with such things. Not long after that,
my wife Dianne also attended the class, and she got
hooked too. So for the next four years we became students
of Nathan Banks Sensei and Toyama Ryu iai. His sensei,
Niikura Katsumi, from Sterling Heights in Detroit
was kind of our overseer. He was the one who conducted
all the testing and arranged major events from time
to time.
Along the way, while I was doing Toyama Ryu iai I
also studied Sho Bu Do Bujutsu Jujutsu (the art of
unarmed combat against armed and unarmed opponents
using joint techniques, throws, chokes and strikes)
That was very interesting and made a very nice complement
(or balance) to what we were doing with the sword
arts. This particular style of jujutsu, which is an
old Okinawan style, also utilizes some weapons techniques
- mainly jo (a 4" staff) and a special yawara
stick (a short stick) - which is kind of unique to
the school. There was also a little bit of sword work
as well, so it was an eclectic sort of style.
In 1993, we made our first trip to Japan as part
of the Michigan-Shiga Sister State Program Goodwill
Mission Cultural Exchange, whereby citizens from Sister
Cities in Michigan go over to visit their respective
Sister Cities in Shiga Prefecture. We took a couple
of extra weeks on that trip and visited some friends
of ours in Yokohama. They, in turn, introduced us
to our current Sensei, Tsumaki Kazuo, whose father
is the current and 14th headmaster of Tamiya Ryu Iaijutsu.
His name is Tsumaki Seirin Motonobu Soke. Since 1993
up to the present, I've been a student of both Soke
sensei (soke is a hereditary headmaster of a martial
arts tradition) and Tsumaki Sensei.
DKB: What particularly interested you about
Tamiya Ryu as a sword style?
MA: As a specific style of iai, one thing
that impressed me very much about comparing Toyama
Ryu and Tamiya Ryu - this can be confusing because
the names sound almost similar. It's very interesting
to note that many of the Tamiya Ryu sensei in Japan
and the Shibucho (branch managers) also once studied
Toyama Ryu; but they found, as I believe happened
with myself and my wife, that the Toyama style was
much heavier on the military aspects of swordsmanship,
being of course the style that was developed for the
Toyama Military Academy. We found the overall emphasis
in the Toyama style to be more on the philosophy of
what we call satsujin no ken or "the sword which
takes life." Tamiya Ryu on the other hand emphasizes
what we call katsujin no ken or "the sword which
gives life." One of the key philosophical points
of Tamiya Ryu is that we do have a very high level
of respect for our opponent - our enemy. We do try
to preserve our opponent's life as well as our own
in the course of our training.
Another aspect of the Tamiya school that I found very
attractive is the fact that it does date back. You
can trace its lineage back over 400 years to Tamiya
Heibei Narimasa or Shigemasa (depending on how you
read the kanji, as Soke says in his volume on Tamiya
Ryu). Tamiya Heibei Narimasa was the first student
of Hayashizaki Jinsuke, who's considered by many scholars
to be the founder of modern iaijutsu or Japanese swordsmanship.
After a certain amount of training with Hayashizaki
Sensei, Tamiya Sensei went on to found the Tamiya
style (of course many other students of Hayashizaki
Jinsuke went on to found other schools like Muso Jikiden
Eishin ryu, Mugai ryu - there's a whole bunch of them
listed in the book). I found the fact that it was
a much older art than the Toyama style very, very
attractive, because of my great interest in Japanese
culture, especially ancient Japanese culture. Being
able to study an art form - and truly iaijutsu is
an art form in many, many ways - to be able to study
something that old, which has remained virtually unchanged
for those four centuries, is wonderful.
Also, to be the first American, as I found out later,
who was even allowed to begin training in this particular
style was a real honor. I can't say "the first
Westerner" because there is another gentleman
in France who preceded me, but as far as America goes,
to my knowledge I am the first American.
In addition, it just so happened that when we met
Tsumaki sensei and realized his father was the grand
master, it was very, very special, because in many
schools of martial arts, the instructor has maybe
third, fourth, or even fifth-hand knowledge of the
techniques and training. Maybe he learned from a guy
who learned from another guy who learned from another
guy who learned in Japan. In the case of our particular
school, Tamiya Ryu, having the advantage of having
Tsumaki sensei as my instructor makes a nice, direct
transmission from the top right down to me and my
students. There's no mixup or miscommunication or
diluting of the pure style.
Another point too that attracted me to Tamiya Ryu
is the fact that it is what I consider to be a very
pure style of iai. It's not a hybrid like some others.
Toyama Ryu, in fact, if I understand correctly, was
sort of an amalgam of three or four different ryu
where the founding teachers took certain elements
and blended them all into one.
 |
|
Deborah Klens-Bigman
and Michael Alexanian
|
I also find that the Tamiya style is much more -
maybe elegant is not the right word to use - but very
refined and very respectful in many ways. We have
a lot of etiquette points that are very important,
especially during a testing situation. Whether it's
in Japan or out of the country, the etiquette is looked
at just as carefully as the performance of kata by
those who are judging. So I think, you know, a combination
of that ancientness or old quality of the art, and
the fact that the teaching is very pure and clean,
and also that it's a very refined style were several
of the things that drew me to it.
DKB: Tamiya Ryu is also a forerunner to Muso
Shinden Ryu, some of the roots of which I'm still
trying to unravel myself. One of the things that attracts
me to Tamiya Ryu is the similarity with Muso Shinden
Ryu. It clearly harkens back to Tamiya Ryu in a way
that Muso Jikiden Eishin Ryu, for example, does not.
It's like visiting an ancestor - I can see the family
resemblance.
MA: It's kind of fortuitous that you should
mention that, because in our very first meeting with
Tsumaki Sensei in 1993 was an interesting session.
Our friend Mrs. Goto arranged for Sensei to give us
a lesson that afternoon, so we came fully dressed
in our gi and hakama. When he was done instructing
us, he asked us if we would show him what we knew
of Toyama Ryu, so we did several kata and several
kumitachi (two person forms). Then he said something
very, very interesting that relates to what you just
said. He said, "You know, all iai basically comes
from the same place." Most of the old schools
of iai, if they trace their lineage back to the very
beginning, all run back to 1597 and Hayashizaki Jinsuke
and his Hayashizaki Ryu. So even the modern styles
have very, very spectral elements of some of the Koryu
styles in them. Sensei's outlook, I think, is a very
good one, because first of all it eliminates a lot
of the competitiveness that tends to exist in many
of the martial arts communities or styles. The fact
is that we're really studying the same thing, just
taking off in a little different direction. Really,
when you trace it all back down to the beginning,
we're all doing the same thing.
DKB: It's like Otani Sensei likes to say,
"there are many paths up the mountain."
MA: Exactly.
DKB: Same mountain.
MA: Same mountain.
DKB: You get to the top, but there are different
ways to get there. One of the things that interests
me -you just said that the teaching is virtually unchanged.
MA: Yes.
DKB: I think this sort of has to do with the
teaching method - teaching by way of kata. One of
the things that a lot of Westerners seem to be skeptical
about is the accuracy of teaching through the use
of kata. Nowadays we have video tapes and things like
that, so everyone assumes the verisimilitude of video
tape is better than the sort of body-to-body teaching
that is involved with kata. I just wanted to ask your
opinion about that.
MA: Yes, actually I have a very strong one.
I find video tape useful in certain contexts. For
instance in our dojo if you walk in you'll notice
the conspicuous absence of mirrors, which are usually
a standard feature in most dojo or martial arts training
halls. In our case we tend to use video to tape our
students as they practice kata. Then what we do at
the end of the class is reserve 15 or 20 minutes and
we all sit down and we review the performance on the
tape. Not only so that the one student can see the
possible things he may need to correct or to work
on, but so that the other students may also see things
that the other person is doing, well, that they may
need to pick up on, and so forth. But as an actual
learning tool, I am very much opposed to the people
who say, "You can learn martial arts from video
tape." I don't think you can do that. It has
been my experience that to really learn any martial
art, whether it be karate or kendo or iai, you need
to work with a qualified instructor, one who has the
ability to transmit the teachings to you. Also, of
course, books and video can only go so far. There's
a lot of what we refer to as okuden or the oral teachings
that you just can't put into books or videos, and
you miss all that if you restrict yourself to a media
form of learning. I think that really breaks down
traditional learning in the Japanese martial arts.
There is a video of Soke sensei which is part of
the Nihon Kobudo series where he does demonstrate
many of the Tamiya ryu kata, and that was very helpful
to me. Tsumaki Sensei gave it to me when we returned
from living in Japan in 1996. I found that in the
absence of having him there to instruct me it was
a very nice aid to my learning. Also, in a long-distance
learning capacity being able to use video, for instance
to tape yourself and send material to your sensei,
was very helpful because he would review it and critique
it and send it back with copious hand-written notes
about what was good and what was bad and so forth
and so on. I think video and similar media has its
advantages and disadvantages but I see it more as
a supplement to real, true experience-based or body-to-body
work. I think by and large video is nice for information
and perhaps practice review, but I'm very much opposed
to people using video as a sole learning tool.
We are very lucky today in that many Japanese instructors
will let you practice or visit their dojo and take
lessons. Not so in the old days, when it was very
very difficult for Americans to get into martial arts
schools. Even today, in many cases you still have
to know somebody. In our case, we knew Mr. & Mrs.
Goto, who were friends of Tsumaki Sensei, because
Mrs. Goto was teaching his son English for his college
entrance exam. When they found we were coming to Japan
and that we did iai, they arranged for the afternoon
lesson.
Meeting Tsumaki Sensei was truly a life-changing
experience for both Dianne and myself. When we first
saw him perform I actually wrote an article called
"Thunder in Yokohama" about that first meeting
and had it published in a couple of different magazines.
The overall feeling we came away with was just one
of such quiet power. The way that sensei taught us
- very one-on-one, very personalized transmission
of teaching technique - is what I've tried to continue
in my style of teaching Tamiya Ryu.
I think that our concern is to continue things as
much as we can in this modern age the way they were
done originally. The way that Tsumaki Sensei has taught
me and the information he has passed on is the same
basic technique and philosophy that I use to teach
my students, and as I witness my students and the
regularity of their attendance, they seem to like
it. I really would not even hazard to change anything
about it at this point in time.
DKB: Do you use bunkai (illustration of applications
of technique) when you teach?
MA: Yes. Especially in a school which is predominantly
kata- or form-based, bunkai for us is very, very important.
When I instruct or teach a new kata for instance,
first of all, I will demonstrate how the kata is done
at full speed, medium speed and slow speed, so the
students get an idea of what they're going to learn.
Then we demonstrate what the kata is for. My senior
student and I perform the actual real-life situation
that the kata is based on. Then from there we break
down the kata numerically into different steps that
can range anywhere from 15, 16 or 20-plus individual
motions.
The bunkai adds an element of realism to learning
the kata. For most of us, if we just learn certain
movements, we really don't have a visualization in
our mind what they're supposed to be used for. With
bunkai you can have a little "mini movie"
in your mind of what's going on on the other side
of what you're doing, and that's most helpful. It
helps to reinforce remembering the kata, not just
sequentially but in random order as well.
All of the kata in Tamiya Ryu, both our first volume
of 11 kata and our second volume of 14 kata, have
very specific names describing something about the
origin of the kata or what the kata does. For instance,
our second kata in the Omote no Maki, our first volume,
is called Oshi Nuki. "Oshi" from the Japanese
verb osu to push or push down, and "nuki"
from nuku/ nukimasu to draw or to pull out. So in
this case Oshi Nuki in English is "to push down
and to draw." So it's very descriptive - a combination
of the explanation and the situation. The defender
and attacker are sitting side by side, facing the
same direction, in seiza. The person to the left,
who is going to attack, slowly begins to reach for
his sword. While I am instructing my students in this,
I will sit right next to them and walk them through
and take the part of the attacker, so they know when
they draw, "what is this side cut for?"
or "what is this tsuki for?", or "why
am I turning the sword over and blocking down?"
They actually feel what happens. I've gotten a few
bruised knuckles out of the deal...
DKB: That's not so bad...
MA: ...That's what happens...
DKB: ...That's what happens when you teach.
MA: Oh yeah.
DKB: This is kind of a funny question but
it's something that people are often interested in
if they've never trained in Japan. Could you describe
a typical training session with Tsumaki Sensei in
Japan?
MA: Certainly. A typical training session
for us usually ran from six to eight hours in a day.
It was usually one big solid day of training when
we were visiting Japan. When we lived there we would
visit Yokohama and stay for three or four days in
which case we would break it up. First of all, training
consisted of very long days when we were in Japan.
It was the month of August so it was very hot. I have
a lot of memories of hot and sweaty training.
DKB: My favorite training month.
MA: Absolutely. But it feels so good when
you're done. You sweat out all that bad stuff and
everything. We would usually begin with just some
warm-up exercises, wrist stretching, things like that
- just five or ten minutes. The rest of time was spent
mainly going through kata. The last time I was with
Tsumaki Sensei this past April (2000), the first part
of the training session was a review of all of the
11 kata in the first volume. He called out the kata
and I and the person I was training with had to perform
not necessarily at the same rate, but at our own speed.
Sensei first took us through all 11 and then went
back and started again with number one and had us
do it all again. Then he made certain corrections
and wrote them on the blackboard so that I could write
down the notes and carry them back to the U.S. and
work on them. We did this for all 11 kata. At the
end, after we'd gone through all 11 once again with
corrections, Sensei went back and reviewed once again.
Sensei is a very strong believer in a lot of reinforcement.
We spent a lot more time on some of the kata which
are particularly difficult, of course, than on others
which he thought were coming along okay. It's been
my experience with the traditional Japanese martial
arts that when you're training with a sensei, if they
make no criticisms at all you probably don't rate
very highly with them.
DKB: Mine, too.
MA: Because they think something's missing,
like maybe your spirit isn't strong enough or maybe
your heart, your kokoro isn't in it. They'll say,
"Oh, that's fine, you're doing well, see you
sometime." But if a Japanese sensei really cares
and really sees in you something of value that he
can nurture and build on he will be brutally merciless
to you and he'll criticize everything. I remember
one circumstance when we were training with a group
of Japanese university students. Sensei didn't particularly
like my final performance at the training session
and just tore me to pieces in front of everyone. I
think a lot of Americans and Westerners would be very
discouraged. They would walk away and think "Oh,
my sensei doesn't like me anymore, blah blah blah,"
and they would quit. But if you take it in the spirit
in which it's intended (as constructive criticism),
then he's saying these things not to upset you or
to make you angry but to make you a better person.
Sensei is very much like that when we train. He can
hammer and hammer and hammer - not literally, of course
- but he can really work on a point until he feels
you've got it right or until he feels you've gotten
to the saturation point and he has to move on to something
else and will come back to it.
One aspect I liked about Tsumaki Sensei's training
sessions was that we would take a break every hour
(of course it being a very hot time of year we had
to), and we would sit and discuss the things we just
trained in. He would ask, "Do you have any questions?
Do you understand what we're doing and why we're doing
it?" This is one important lesson I've learned
from Tsumaki Sensei in passing on Tamiya Ryu to other
people: in a sense the more you know the more proficient
you can be in a kata. This is not just knowing the
physical motions - being able to mimic someone going
through the kata - but to actually understand why
you are doing certain things. Why do you draw the
sword and leave it vertical until the very last moment
when you turn the sword horizontal and draw for the
nukitsuke? Little points like that Sensei is always
very careful to explain. I would say in a typical
six- to eight-hour training session maybe one to two
hours of that may be actual verbal instruction or
explanation of techniques.
You know, if you think about it, in today's world
many karate dojo and other martial arts schools rely
so much in many ways on mimicry. You know, they say
"watch the instructor, do what he does,"
which can be fine, but if you don't know why you're
doing it, you're just mimicking. There's going to
be an element missing. I think for us, in Tamiya Ryu,
and I've had long discussions with Tsumaki sensei
about this, what we really try to do is combine the
mind and the spirit and the body to work together.
Mind in the sense of understanding academically what
you're doing. The body - getting the body to work
with the mind and correspond to the things you've
learned. Of course the most important part, the heart
or the spirit, the kokoro, is in knowing that this
is a very old and respected art, respecting all its
traditions and doing your best within yourself to
honor Tamiya Ryu, not only in the dojo but in your
daily life as well.
Go
to Part 2
More information about
Tamiya ryu Iaijutsu and other traditional Japanese
arts in East Lansing, and about the Michigan-Shiga
Sister State program, is available through Michael
and Dianne Alexanian's website, www.shakunage.org
They can be contacted via email at info@shakunage.org.
About The Interviewer:
Deborah Klens-Bigman is Manager and Associate Instructor
of iaido at New York Budokai in New York City. She
has also studied, to varying extents, kendo, jodo
(short staff), kyudo (archery) and naginata (halberd).
She received her Ph.D in 1995 from New York University's
Department of Performance Studies where she wrote
her dissertation on Japanese classical dance (Nihon
Buyo). and she continues to study Nihon Buyo with
Fujima Nishiki at the Ichifuji-kai Dance Association.
Her article on the application of performance theory
to Japanese martial arts appeared in the Journal
of Asian Martial Arts in the summer of 1999. She
is married to artist Vernon Bigman.

back
to top
home
| about
us | magazine
| learning
| connections
| estore
|